Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 1059
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 238-243

Preoperative analysis of risk of malignancy indices in the distinction of malignant ovarian tumors


Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Puducherry, India

Correspondence Address:
B Moshina
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Puducherry - 607 402
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ccij.ccij_102_20

Rights and Permissions

Background: Ovarian cancers are three times more lethal than breast cancer, despite its lower prevalence rate. Thus, it is imperative to determine if an ovarian mass is benign or malignant to structure a pertinent management protocol. Aim and Objective: The study proposed to preoperatively compare the predictive values of the four risk of malignancy indices (RMIs) and categorized benign and malignant ovarian masses. Methodology: The study included 60 women undergoing surgery for ovarian masses. Parameters such as age, menopausal status, ultrasound findings, tumor size, and cancer antigen (CA)-125 levels were recorded. They were assessed through 4 RMI scores and compared with postsurgical histopathological examination (HPE) report. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated. The level of significance was set atP ≤ 0.05. Results: As per the HPE report, 54 (90%) patients were diagnosed with benign and 6 (10%) with malignant ovarian masses. The median levels of CA-125 were significant (P = 0.014). For the universally recommended RMI cutoff values, sensitivity was 66.7%, specificity ranged from 83.3% to 88.9%, PPV from 36.3% to 40.0%, and NPV from 95.7% to 96%. With the suggested cutoff values obtained by plotting the receiver operating characteristic from the study, sensitivity was 66.6%, specificity ranged from 87.03% to 100.0%, PPV was 100.0%, and NPV was 93.1%. The area under the curve ranged from 0.836 to 0.854. Conclusion: The results of the present study endorse the potency of the RMIs. This certifies that the RMIs are valuable diagnostic tools in discriminating ovarian masses, which could ensure appurtenant management.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed879    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal