Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 37
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 198-204

Presentation and outcome of patients with an adrenal mass: A retrospective observational study


1 Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Baramulla, India
2 Department of Endocrinology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
4 Department of Urology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Date of Submission17-May-2020
Date of Decision15-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance17-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication12-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Tauseef Nabi
Department of Endocrinology, MMIMSR, E 32, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ccij.ccij_70_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Adrenal masses are uncommon, often present with a wide spectrum of manifestations, ranging from silent, benign incidentaloma to functional and rarely highly malignant neoplasm. The study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an adrenal mass. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study on 42 patients diagnosed with an adrenal mass, between August 2010 and August 2019 at our institute. They were studied for clinical, laboratory, radiological, and surgical outcome. All the patients were subjected to computed tomography adrenal protocol and hormonal evaluation (overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test [ONDST] and urinary metanephrine/normetanephrine in all; plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio [ARR] in patients with hypertension/hypokalemia). Results: The mean age of the study sample was 45.2 ± 12.4 years, with female (69%) predominance. Symptomatic adrenal mass (52.4%) was the most common presentation. Abdominal pain (61.9%) and hypertension (54.8%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Obesity and dyslipidemia were present in half of the patients and hyperglycemia in 23.8%. The majority of tumors were benign (90.5%). Most of the adrenals lesions were nonfunctional (47.6%), followed by pheochromocytoma (26.2%), primary hyperaldosteronism (7.1%), and adrenal Cushing's syndrome (7.1%). Most of the lesions were large, i.e., >4 cm (42.8%). The surgical cure was achieved in 74.1% of patients, with good outcome in nonfunctional adrenal adenoma and myelolipoma. Age ≤40 years was associated with functional adrenal mass. Conclusions: A higher proportion of patients have functional tumors, with pheochromocytomas comprising 26.3%. Majority of patients achieved surgical cure. Age ≤40 years predicted functionality of adrenal mass.

Keywords: Adrenal mass, myelolipoma, nonfunctional adrenal adenoma, pheochromocytoma, primary hyperaldosteronism


How to cite this article:
Rafiq N, Nabi T, Dar SA, Rasool S. Presentation and outcome of patients with an adrenal mass: A retrospective observational study. Clin Cancer Investig J 2020;9:198-204

How to cite this URL:
Rafiq N, Nabi T, Dar SA, Rasool S. Presentation and outcome of patients with an adrenal mass: A retrospective observational study. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24];9:198-204. Available from: https://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2020/9/5/198/298004




  Introduction Top


The adrenal gland is composed of cortex and medulla, and both have different embryonic origin. The adrenal tumors vary in manifestation, depending on the zone from which they arise from the adrenal gland. The term adrenal mass is not a single entity; instead, it is an “umbrella” definition, comprising a spectrum of various pathological entities.[1] An adrenal mass is incidentally found in up to 4%–7% of patients imaged for nonadrenal disease,[2] with nearly 80% of these masses found to be benign.[3],[4],[5],[6] An adrenal incidentaloma is a adrenal mass, which is unexpectedly detected through an imaging procedure performed for reasons unrelated to adrenal dysfunction.[7] This definition excludes patients undergoing imaging procedure as part of malignancy staging and workup. Incidentalomas are uncommon in patients younger than 30 years of age, but increase in frequency with age. The diagnosis of adrenal mass focuses on two main questions: whether the lesion is malignant and or hormonally active.[8]

Almost 15% of patients with adrenal masses present with signs and symptoms of adrenal hormonal excess.[9] Most incidentalomas are adrenocortical adenomas, but occasionally, they represent myelolipomas, hamartomas, or granulomatous infiltrations of the adrenal gland. Functioning tumors include pheochromocytomas and primary hyperaldosteronism, are diagnosed in 11%–15% and 4%–10% of patients with adrenal incidentalomas, respectively, and adrenocortical carcinomas (ACCs) account for around 11% of patients with adrenal incidentalomas.[6],[9] Advances in the diagnostic evaluation and utilization of minimally invasive surgery have improved the management of adrenal tumors. Pertinent assessment of an adrenal mass is an essential step before its definitive treatment. Radiological evaluation includes computed tomography (CT) with attenuation values expressed in Hounsfield units. The three most essential imaging criteria to distinguish between benign and malignant adrenal lesions are (1) size of the lesion, (2) the CT attenuation value on an unenhanced CT scan, and (3) the percentage of contrast washout. All patients have to undergo hormonal evaluation for subclinical Cushing's syndrome (SCS) and pheochromocytoma, and those with hypertension also require evaluation for primary hyperaldosteronism. Further hormonal evaluation is based on clinical and radiological findings.[10] SCS occurs in up to 20%–30% of all cases.[2]

Functional or malignant adrenal masses require immediate management [11],[12] and surgical excision is the treatment of choice for these tumors.[10],[13] Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice, compared with open adrenalectomy. Adequate preparation and close endocrine supervision perioperatively and postoperatively are required for functional tumors.[8] The surgical cure varies with etiology of adrenal mass and is poor in functional and malignant lesions.

Although there are several studies on the characteristics of adrenal mass from centres around the world as well as India.[6],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19] but to date, there are no reports of the clinical presentation and outcome of patients with adrenal mass from our centre. To date, there are no reports of the clinical presentation and outcome of patients with an adrenal mass from our center. This study was undertaken to determine the characteristics and outcome of adrenal mass in patients who attended and were managed at tertiary care hospital in North India.


  Materials and Methods Top


Subjects

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients with adrenal lesions discovered via CT scan at a tertiary care hospital between August 2010 and August 2019. The study center is a public tertiary referral teaching hospital with a total bed capacity of almost 850. The study included all patients aged 18 years or older with adrenal mass except patients having adrenal metastases and missing baseline characteristics or incomplete hormonal evaluation. After applying these exclusion criteria, the total number of subjects eligible for the study was 42 (13 males and 29 females). The institutional ethical committee approved the study.

Data collection

Clinical information on all patients with an adrenal mass was retrieved from the hospital records. For each patient, information at presentation and postsurgery was recorded. These included demographic details; clinical presentation; associated comorbidities; physical examination; biochemical, radiological, and hormonal evaluation; and surgical findings. Other routine biochemical and hematological tests (plasma glucose, renal function, lipid profile, serum calcium, full blood count, and electrolytes) were also available.

Adrenal protocol CT scan

For newly discovered adrenal lesion, an adrenal protocol CT was used. This consists of unenhanced images, images obtained 1 min after interneurons injection of contrast media, and imaging after a 10–15-min delay. Criteria for benign lesions include HU of <10 HU on unenhanced CT scan, and absolute percentage enhancement washout of >60%, which has 98% sensitivity and 92% specificity.[20]

Biochemical analysis

The hormonal evaluation included 8:00 am fasting basal serum cortisol level, overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (ONDST), 24-h urine vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), 24-h urine metanephrine and normetanephrine levels, serum aldosterone level, and plasma renin activity. Autonomous cortisol secretion was excluded when ONDST cortisol levels fell below 1.8 μg/dL, as recommended by the National Institutes of Health.[3] Patients were considered to have SCS if ONDST cortisol level remained above 5.0 μg/dL without features of Cushing's syndrome.[9] When hypercortisolemia was found, confirmatory tests were performed, such as cortisol rhythm, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (Liddle I test, dexamethasone 0.5 mg p.o. every 6 h for 2 days), urinary free cortisol (UFC), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST). The biochemical criteria used for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma were a 24-h urine fractionated metanephrine level >3 times the upper limit of the normal reference range for the laboratory.[21] Plasma aldosterone/renin activity ratio (ARR) was the screening used for primary hyperaldosteronism, and patients with ARR >20 were suspected of having primary hyperaldosteronism; a saline infusion test was performed to confirm this diagnosis. We grouped all adrenal masses into various diagnostic categories, based on clinical, biochemical, and radiological characteristics.

Diagnosis

Nonfunctional adrenal adenoma was diagnosed when CT scan revealed round-to-oval, homogeneous mass with smooth margins, precontrast <10 HU, >50% washout, ONDST <5 μg/dL, and metanephrines negative.

Pheochromocytoma was diagnosed when CT scan revealed round-to-oval, inhomogeneous adrenal mass, precontrast >10 HU, <50% washout, and urinary metanephrine/VMA ≥3 times the upper limit of normal.

Hyperaldosteronism was diagnosed when the patient presented with hypertension, hypokalemia, ARR >20, positive saline load test, CT features of adrenal adenoma, or hyperplasia.

Adrenal Cushing's syndrome was diagnosed when the patient presented with specific clinical features, ONSDT ≥1.8 μg/dL, LDSST ≥1.8 μg/dL, UFC > upper normal limit (40–120 mg/24 h), 9 am ACTH <10, HDDST <50% suppression, and with CT features of adrenal adenoma.

Myelolipoma was diagnosed when CT scan revealed round-to-oval, homogeneous mass with smooth margins, precontrast <−30 HU, ONDST <5 μg/dL, and metanephrines negative.

ACC was diagnosed when CT scan revealed an irregular and inhomogeneous mass, precontrast >10 HU, <50% washout, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate > 800 ug/dL.

Definition

Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m 2; hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg or on antihypertensive drugs; diabetes when blood glucose fasting was ≥126 mg/dl or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% or on antidiabetic drugs; and dyslipidemia when triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein ≥140 mg/dl, or high-density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl in males and <50 mg/dl in females or on statin therapy.

Adrenalectomy was recommended in patients with overt hormonal hypersecretion, a significantly large (diameter >4 cm) or growing mass, or radiographic features suspicious of malignancy. The cure was defined biochemically in secretory tumors as the normal range of hormone, in whom the preoperative levels were elevated and by the absence of tumor on radiological imaging postsurgery. In patients with nonsecretory (nonfunctional) tumors, the cure was determined radiologically by the absence of tumor on radiological imaging postsurgery. Follow-up was undertaken by the endocrinology clinic for all patients and included clinical examination, repeat hormonal testing, and imaging.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and clinical data. Frequency distribution was assessed in terms of means ± standard deviation for quantitative variables and number (percentages) for categorical variables. In univariate analysis, the categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test and/or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. For continuous variables, the independent Student's t-test was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All variables that resulted in P < 0.05 in univariate analyses were entered into a logistic regression analysis to assess independent associations between risk factors and functional adrenal tumors. All the analyses were performed using the statistical software known as Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA, version 21.0).


  Results Top


Demographic data

The mean age at presentation was 45.2 ± 12.4 years (range, 18–62 years). Females (69%) outnumbered the males. Twenty-three patients presented at an age between 50 and 60 years. In all patients, the diagnosis of adrenal mass was made antemortem [Table 1].
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients with an adrenal mass

Click here to view


Clinical presentation

[Table 1] shows the clinical features at presentation. The incidental mode of presentation was noted in 47.6% of patients, whereas others had a symptomatic presentation. The most common symptom was pain abdomen (61.9%). Other symptoms noted were headache, palpitation, hirsutism, and acute abdomen. Abdominal mass was palpable in 19% of patients. Hypertension was present in 54.8% of patients.

Tumor location and characteristics

Of the all adrenal masses, the majority (95.2%; n = 40) of patients were unilateral and left-sided (50%; n = 21) tumors; 4.8% of patients had bilateral adrenal mass. The tumor was benign in 38 (90.5%) patients and malignant in 9.5% of patients. One patient each had metastases to liver and lungs. Most of the tumors were large, i.e., >4 cm in 42.8% of cases.

Biochemical characteristics

All patients had a hormonal evaluation for Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma, whereas ARR was done in patients with hypertension/hypokalemia. Twenty patients had nonsecretory lesions, of which 13 patients had nonfunctional adrenal adenoma, five patients had myelolipoma, and one patient each had adrenal cyst and lymphoma. SCS was present in 7.1% of patients. Of the secretory lesions, 26.2% of patients had pheochromocytoma, three patients each with primary hyperaldosteronism and Cushing's syndrome, and two patients had ACC, as shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Hormonal and radiological characteristics of patients with an adrenal mass

Click here to view


Radiological tests

CT scan of the abdomen with the adrenal protocol was used to localize the tumor in all our patients. Four patients had evidence of malignancy as judged by the presence of metastasis to lungs/liver and locoregional spread.

Preoperative preparation

All patients having pheochromocytoma received alpha-blocker, followed by beta-blocker before the operation. Preoperative correction of the intravascular volume was done in all patients. Of the 27 patients in whom adrenalectomy was documented, open procedure was done in 63% and laparoscopic in 37% of patients.

Patient outcome

The overall surgical cure was achieved in 74.1% (n = 20), with 100% cure in nonfunctional adrenal adenoma, myelolipoma, and SCS. Four patients required redo surgery, as shown in [Table 3].
Table 3: Favorable surgical outcome of patients with an adrenal mass

Click here to view


Factors predicting functional lesion

The factors which differentiated function adrenal masses from nonfunctional were younger age at presentation (≤40 years), obesity, symptomatic presentation, and small tumor diameter, whereas on multivariate analysis, only patients aged ≤40 years at presentation predicted the functional lesion, as shown in [Table 4].
Table 4: Characteristics of patients with an adrenal mass divided on the basis of functionality

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Modern imaging modalities have made adrenal mass a common occurrence in clinical practice. Although the adrenal mass can have an extensive differential diagnosis, nonsecreting cortical adenomas (75%) account for the majority. The prevalence of various adrenal masses varies between surgical series.[9],[22] The optimal management of an adrenal mass is to rule out malignancy from the lesions and to identify the functioning from the nonfunctioning tumors.[10]

Our study involved a retrospective review of the clinical characteristics and outcome of 42 patients with adrenal masses. The mean age was 45.2 ± 12.4 years, with a female predominance. Symptomatic adrenal mass (52.4%) was the most common mode of presentation. Abdominal pain and hypertension were the most common presenting symptoms. Obesity and dyslipidemia were present in half of the patients and hyperglycemia in 23.8%. Majority of tumors were benign (90.5%). Most of the adrenals lesions were nonfunctional (47.6%), followed by pheochromocytoma (26.2%), as shown in [Table 2]. Lesions were equally distributed on either side, with slight left predominance. Most of the lesions were large (>4 cm). The surgical cure was achieved in 74.1% of patients, with good outcome in nonfunctional adrenal adenoma, myelolipoma, and SCS. Age ≤40 years was predictive of the functional adrenal mass.

The size of the lesion is also indicative of its etiology, with higher chances of malignancy in larger tumors. A cutoff of 4 cm is an accepted size, beyond which suspicion of malignancy should increase.[23] In a study by Giordano R, et al., 118 patients of adrenal masses with initial tumors size of 2.22 cm, an increase in the tumor size occurred in seven patients and a decrease in size was noted in two patients, when followed up for 3 years. Furthermore, no malignancy was noted in tumor smaller than 4 cm in this series.[24] Herrera etal.[25] reported a malignancy rate of only 1.5% in their series of 342 patients and all were >5 cm in size.

Various studies have shown the mean age of the presentation is between fifth to sixth decade, with female preponderance.[5],[16],[26],[27] The younger age at presentation in our study could be because many adrenal masses were functional lesions, which are known to present at a younger age. The clinical presentation of adrenal mass varies, with abdominal pain being the most common presentation. The study by Khanna et al.[16] reported pain abdomen in 57.14% of patients. The study by Li et al.[15] showed that a significant number of patients had hypertension (53.9%), dyslipidemia (29.8%), and diabetes (13.3%), as was seen in our study.

Left side predominance has been seen by many studies,[18],[26] contrary to other reports.[6],[28] However, in our study, the left adrenal gland was more frequently affected; this could likely be due to the diagnostic modality used. Mantero et al.[6] used ultrasonography as their diagnostic technique and found right predominance, as this imaging allows for greater visualization of the right adrenal gland than the left.[29] However, no difference in location was apparent in studies for evaluating adrenal mass using CT scans [25],[30] or at autopsy.[2]

The percentage of various etiologies for adrenal mass varies by study, due to differences in selection criteria and referral bias. The prevalence of pheochromocytoma varies between 1.5% and 23% and that of ACC is 1.2%–12%.[31] In a Korean study,[32] the prevalence of functioning adrenal tumors reported was reported to be as high as 41.0%, as was seen in our study.

Pheochromocytoma was seen in a higher number of patients in our study as compared to world literature, which could be because of referral bias; however, other studies [14],[32] also revealed pheochromocytoma in around 20% of the adrenal mass patients. In another study, the prevalence of subclinical Cushing's and Cushing's syndrome were slightly higher compared to those in our study.[33] In our study, >70% of pheochromocytoma patients were deemed as cured (biochemically and/or radiologically), which is similar to results reported in other studies (79%–92.6%).[34],[35]

One series reported that older patients were more likely to develop hormonal hyperfunction, although the association was not significant.[36] Several studies demonstrated that tumor size >3 cm at diagnosis was related to the occurrence of hormonal hyperfunction.[36],[37] The Korean study reported that age, tumor size, number, and location showed no statistical significance as risk factors for functioning tumors.[32] Another study also revealed that age, BMI, tumor size, number, and location were not independent risk factors for functional tumors.[18] Kim et al.[37] in their study revealed that BMI, fasting glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and presence of type 2 diabetes, and hypertension were significantly higher in patients with SCS in comparison with those with nonfunctioning tumors. However, interpretation of these data has to be considered with caution because of the possibility of confounding and referral bias.

This study has several limitations, including that it was a retrospective review of cases from a single-center and the sample size was small. There was a lack of proper clinical and biochemical follow-up of some patients.


  Conclusion Top


A significant proportion of patients have functional tumors. Pheochromocytomas (26.3%) were the most frequently observed, followed by primary hyperaldosteronism (7.1%). The surgical cure was achieved in 74.1% of patients. Patients with functional lesions were comparatively young (≤40 years) as compared to nonfunctional. Surgery is required in all the functional adrenal masses and large adenomas. Benign lesions, when excised completely, result in excellent long-term outcome. Further, prospective studies with large sample size and long-term follow-up are required to address this issue.

Acknowledgments

I want to thank the entire Department of Endocrinology and Radiaton Oncology of GMC Srinagar.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I, Loli P, Furlani L, Arnaldi G, et al. AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol 2011;164:851-70.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kloos RT, Gross MD, Francis IR, Korobkin M, Shapiro B. Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 1995;16:460-84.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mansmann G, Lau J, Balk E, Rothberg M, Miyachi Y, Bornstein SR. The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: Update in diagnosis and management. Endocr Rev 2004;25:309-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, Sperone P, Novello S, Berruti A, et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 2006;29:298-302.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Barzon L, Sonino N, Fallo F, Palu G, Boscaro M. Prevalence and natural history of adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2003;149:273-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, Osella G, Masini AM, Alì A, et al. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:637-44.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Aron D, Terzolo M, Cawood TJ. Adrenal incidentalomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;26:69-82.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM. Williams Text Book of Endocrinology. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, Dralle H, Newell-Price J, Sahdev A, et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 2016;175:G1-34.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zeiger MA, Siegelman SS, Hamrahian AH. Medical and surgical evaluation and treatment of adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:2004-15.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Allolio B, Fassnacht M. Clinical review: Adrenocortical carcinoma: Clinical update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2027-37.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet 2005;366:665-75.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Terzolo M, Bovio S, Reimondo G, Pia A, Osella G, Borretta G, et al. Subclinical Cushing's syndrome in adrenal incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2005;34:423-39, x.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Iñiguez-Ariza NM, Kohlenberg JD, Delivanis DA, Hartman RP, Dean DS, Thomas MA, et al. Clinical, biochemical, and radiological characteristics of a single-center retrospective cohort of 705 large adrenal tumors. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018;2:30-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Li L, Yang G, Zhao L, Dou J, Gu W, Lv Z, et al. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with adrenal incidentaloma from a single center in China: a survey. Int J Endocrinol 2017;2017:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Khanna S, Priya R, Bhartiya SK, Basu S, Shukla VK. Adrenal tumors: An experience of 10 years in a single surgical unit. Indian J Cancer 2015;52:475-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
17.
Murai M, Baba S, Nakashima J, Tachibana M. Management of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. World J Urol 1999;17:9-14.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cho YY, Suh S, Joung JY, Jeong H, Je D, Yoo H, et al. Clinical characteristics and follow-up of Korean patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Korean J Intern Med 2013;28:557-64.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Khan FU, Mahmood A, Khan MU. Adrenal tumors clinical presentation, surgical treatment and outcome. Pakistan J Med Health Sci 2013;7;672-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Platt JF, Dunnick NR, et al. Adrenal masses: Characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 2002;222:629-33.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grebe SK, Murad MH, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:1915-42.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Aron DC. The adrenal incidentaloma: Disease of modern technology and public health problem. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2001;2:335-42.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Libè R, Dall'Asta C, Barbetta L, Baccarelli A, Beck-Peccoz P, Ambrosi B. Long-term follow-up study of patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2002;147:489-94.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Giordano R, Marinazzo E, Berardelli R, Picu A, Maccario M, Ghigo E, et al. Long-term morphological, hormonal, and clinical follow-up in a single unit on 118 patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2010;162:779-85.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Herrera MF, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Sheedy PF, Ilstrup DM. Incidentally discovered adrenal tumors: An institutional perspective. Surgery 1991;110:1014-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Vasilev V, Matrozova J, Elenkova A, Zacharieva S. Clinical characteristics and follow-up of incidentally found adrenal tumours-results from a single tertiary centre. Open Med 2014;9:292-301.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kim J, Bae KH, Choi YK, Jeong JY, Park KG, Kim JG, et al. Clinical characteristics for 348 patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2013;28:20-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Barzon L, Scaroni C, Sonino N, Fallo F, Gregianin M, Macrì C, et al. Incidentally discovered adrenal tumors: Endocrine and scintigraphic correlates. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:55-62.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Yeh HC. Sonography of the adrenal glands: Normal glands and small masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;135:1167-77.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Abecassis M, McLoughlin MJ, Langer B, Kudlow JE. Serendipitous adrenal masses: Prevalence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 1985;149:783-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Lee JM, Kim MK, Ko SH, Koh JM, Kim BY, Kim SW, et al. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adrenal Incidentaloma. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017;32:200-18.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Kim HY, Kim SG, Lee KW, Seo JA, Kim NH, Choi KM, et al. Clinical study of adrenal incidentaloma in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2005;20:303-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Comlekci A, Yener S, Ertilav S, Secil M, Akinci B, Demir T, et al. Adrenal incidentaloma, clinical, metabolic, follow-up aspects: Single centre experience. Endocrine 2010;37:40-6.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Zorgani AE, Pirie FJ, Motala AA. Characteristics and outcome of patients with pheochromocytoma at a tertiary endocrinology clinic in Durban, South Africa over 14 years. J Endocrinol Metabolism Diabetes South Afr 2018;23:52-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Plouin PF, Amar L, Lepoutre C. Phaeochromocytomas and functional paragangliomas: Clinical management. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;24:933-41.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Barzon L, Scaroni C, Sonino N, Fallo F, Paoletta A, Boscaro M. Risk factors and long-term follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:520-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Kim BY, Chun AR, Kim KJ, Jung CH, Kang SK, Mok JO, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic features of patients with adrenal incidentalomas with or without Subclinical Cushing's Syndrome. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2014;29:457-63.  Back to cited text no. 37
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed76    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal