Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 110--113

Comparison and frequency of cell cultured in 48-h and 72-h mitotically treated with phytohemagglutinin-M: Both promise for normal and cancer cells


Alireza Abadi1, Zeinab Mazloumi2, Ali Asghar Kolahi1, Mojgan Sheikhpour3, Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani4, Afshin Moradi5, Mahsa Ahadi5, Fatemeh Shaabanpour Aghamaleki6, Niloufar Safavi7, Mohammad Hassan Heidary8, Mahdi Zamani9, Sima Kianpour Rad10, Maliheh Entezari11, Mehrdad Hashemi11, Abolfazl Movafagh12,  
1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Biology, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
3 Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Microbiology Research Center (MRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
4 Proteomics Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Cellular-Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
7 Department of Medical Bactriology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
8 Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
9 Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
10 Molecular Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
11 Department of Genetics, Faculty of advanced Sciences and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
12 Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Abolfazl Movafagh
Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran

Abstract

The aim of the present study is hence to comprise of mitotic index outcome in the individuals of normal volunteers involved in two different period of culture with effect of Phytohemagglutinin-M. Comparison of healthy human donors lymphocytes were cultured for 48-h and 72-h and using conventional karyotype technique with minor modification. Mitotic index and cell proliferation frequency were analyzed in the individuals of normal blood donors after preparing of colchicine to cultured metaphases 2 h before cell fixation. The metaphase indices at 48-h and 72-h culture period resulted a perfect yield product. Lymphocytes populations in 72-h laboratory work were more than 48-h cultures (2.73% at 72 h vs. 1.48% at 48 h, P ≤ 0.05). The present research indicates significant comparisons for laboratories and individuals to be set up. With effect of these results, it may help in time-consuming and short time period for patient, as well as fresh suggestion for health-care management decision. Reagent, manual, budget, time for diagnosis, and health-care fulfillment may resolve of this proposal.



How to cite this article:
Abadi A, Mazloumi Z, Kolahi AA, Sheikhpour M, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Moradi A, Ahadi M, Aghamaleki FS, Safavi N, Heidary MH, Zamani M, Rad SK, Entezari M, Hashemi M, Movafagh A. Comparison and frequency of cell cultured in 48-h and 72-h mitotically treated with phytohemagglutinin-M: Both promise for normal and cancer cells.Clin Cancer Investig J 2020;9:110-113


How to cite this URL:
Abadi A, Mazloumi Z, Kolahi AA, Sheikhpour M, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Moradi A, Ahadi M, Aghamaleki FS, Safavi N, Heidary MH, Zamani M, Rad SK, Entezari M, Hashemi M, Movafagh A. Comparison and frequency of cell cultured in 48-h and 72-h mitotically treated with phytohemagglutinin-M: Both promise for normal and cancer cells. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 21 ];9:110-113
Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2020/9/4/110/292157


Full Text



 Introduction



Cytogenetics is the science of arranging and preparing all the metaphases of an chromosome populations.[1] Chromosome preparation is more essential for staining that results toward features of structural and numerical for all metaphases.[2] Cytogenetic are currently is the panel of useful diagnostic for genetic disorders, specific birth defects, and even leukemias and cancers.[3,4] Cytogenetic are arranging from metaphase cells that has been arrested in the prometaphase and metaphase section of the cycle cell, where metaphases seems their highest condense compare to prometaphase performance.[5,6] The number of specimen shall be utilized as a source of these metaphases. Genetics are prepare from whole blood materials,[7] biopsy of skin,[8] diagnosis of prenatal,[9] chorionic villus or amniotic fluid specimens[10] are manipulate as the specimen of cells.

Normal karyotype among patients with acute myeloid leukemias is rare, accounting for <20% of cases reported in the current literature.[11]

The presence of karyotypic abnormalities, with aneuploidies that are currently found in several different cancers and others syndromes are specific and nonrandom to individual tumors and tissues/organs of origin.[12]

Instead, the fact that the tissue/site of origin is important in determining karyotypic patterns in cancer cells indicates that selection of specific karyotypes must also depend on the specific biology and physiology of cells from different tissues/organs. Indeed, microarray analysis of cells from different tissues shows tissue-specific gene expression patterns in normal diploid cells.[13] Most cancer cells are aneuploid and display a chromosomal instability phenotype; chromosomal instability can be caused by numerous mechanisms.[14]

The exact timing for mitotic cycle is well established; it can be explain that any different timing culture in the growing rate of the cell culture are because of differences in the chromosome indices and not due to manipulation in the exact time of mitosis.

Aberration in cell cycle mitotic index are established to be upon the culture of both situation and the respond of the lymphocytes of each person to ability of phytohemagglutinin (PHA) effects in times period differences.[15,16] The index mitosis and kinetic of cell cycle without lymphocytes are exhibited to differ herald among donors of blood specimen.[16] With effect of these results, it may help in time-consuming and short time period for patient, as well as fresh suggestion for health-care management policies.[17],[18] Reagent, manual, budget, time for diagnosis, and health-care fulfillment may resolve these investigations.[19],[20] The present research work represents a detailed study of mitogen phytohemagglutinin (PHA-M) properties of cell populations involved in two different periods of culture.

 Materials and Methods



Patients and sample collection

The present research study with 100 adult normal volunteers of either sex at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science was elaborated between 2015 and 2018. These healthy subjects were chosen from a common blood donor who had not infected and exposed to chemical materials, different rays, reagent substances, drugs, or other that could hazard mitotic alteration percentage.

In one sample, 0.5 ml to 1.0 ml peripheral blood was taken and manipulating cell culture procedure as; (a) 48–h stimulated culture test and (b) 72-h were used stimulation culture technique. The cultures were set up here after a modified method. For present cell culture procedure, 3–5 × 106 cells was cultured in 4 ml tissue culture media (Gibco-BRL Grand Island, RPMI 1640, NY, USA) added with 10%–14% inactivated with heat of fetal calf serum (Gibco-BRL Grand Island, RPMI 1640, NY, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2 condition. The standard of metaphase cell growing from 48-h stimulations as well as from 72-h cultures was noted based on the references with minor modified method. Finally, the cultured lymphocytes were treated with colchicine (Grand Island, NY, USA, Gibco-BRL), total volume 10 μg/ml, and then incubated at 37°C for 3 min. The volume of the culture flask was then centrifuged for 8 min at 1000 rpm in 10 ml of 75 KCl mM (0.55%) resuspended and prewarmed to 37°C for 20 min. In this step, 1 ml of standard fixative (1:3 acetic acid: methanol) was increased into the flask, and the step of fixation was done 4 times. Twenty slides were arranged for every sample test and stained for 3 min with Giemsa stain. Examination of slides was tested with a Nikon light microscope. Hundred spread of metaphases was evaluated for cytogenetic study. Metaphases were defined based on the ISCN.[21]

Mitotic index determination

The mitotic indices of cultures harvested after 48 and 72 h of incubation were calculated as the number of metaphases among 1000 randomly scanned lymphocytes and expressed in percentages. In other words, mitotic indices were compiled from counts of 1000 mononuclear cells.[22]

Statistical analysis

The protocol for statistical package for research work v. 21.0 for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Differences in mitotic index frequencies between the two periods culture comparison were used Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

 Results



Data of mitotic observation

Observation of present investigation of mitotic activities and chromosome index in lymphocytes of donors peripheral blood have been resulted the 48-h and 72-h effect of similar culture concentrations.

A brief study of the chromosome indices and karyotype data is exhibited in [Table 1]. As resulted, the chromosome index of the harvested cultures at 72 h was significantly higher than the 48 h specimen (2.73% at 72 h vs. 1.48% at 48 h, P ≤ 0.05). The different karyotyping yields between the normal female and male blood donors were almost similar in the current investigation at the both culture times. The vast variety in cell population index of harvested lymphocytes was evaluated among blood volunteers.{Table 1}

The culture conditions were equal for both harvesting times. The comparison of mitotic of each volunteer with effect of PHA stimulation and the mitotic index production, the mitotic populations were noticed in a different culture frequency. Furthermore, no qualitative difference was set up between the two types of cultures, observed in both culture periods. Overall, in the present study a higher products in metaphase index of all blood donor sample was investigated. However, many mitotic products with higher degree of metaphases contraction were noticed. A nonrandom selection of well-prepared slides including cell populations index were chosen in these culture conditions. An increase in the population of mitotic with abnormal metaphases such as gap and break were also observed due to unexpected reason [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

 Discussion



It was considered that the 48-h cell cultures consist of division first mitosis cell cycle. In other hand, as many as of geneticist has used 72-h as the ideal cell culture period for routine diagnosis.

Most researchers in the laboratories investigate karyotypes, prepared from mitotic cells that have been treated PHA stimulus for 72-h in the prometaphase or metaphase stage of the cycle cell, when chromosome consider their most condensed performances.[5],[8],[10] It would be prudent to take advantage of higher metaphase indices of cultures and treated with PHA at 72–h.[22] In accordance with reports in the current literature and the result of this project performed on all healthy blood donors as described earlier, the metaphase index of the PHA-treated cultures and harvested at 72 h was significantly higher than the 48-h samples (2.73% at 72 h vs. 1.48% at 48 h, P ≤ 0.05). On the other hand, the metaphase index and kinetic cell cycle of untreated with PHA, metaphases production were noticed with different results for normal samples from blood donor was reported in the current literature.[23],[24] The lymphocytes subpopulation cellular is of good idea from a standard standpoint till it is the section of the population of lymphocytes when it contributes to develop in the lymphocytes number. Therefore, any differences in the cell growing percentage of the culture are resulted to be mirrored by the presence of lymphocytes undergoing cellular divisions that could be reasonably approximated by the metaphases population of cell growth.[11] In spite of the cell cycle kinetic findings, lymphocyte growth activity were seen in the cultures flask. Incubates for <48 h cannot be possible owing to the less of an average count of mitotic indexes.[25],[26] Evaluation of the percentage of chromosome structural abnormalities (CA) in different culture periods mostly affected by radiation for circular metaphases is now currently manipulated in karyotyping evaluated on human individuals.[18] According to the results reported by some workers, it is reasonable to express that 48 h cannot be the difficult period in the detection of spontaneously happening chromosomal abnormalities in healthy normal volunteers. Despite the possibility that as many as abnormal metaphases may be eliminated or many abnormalities might be restituted from 48- h to 72-h gap period time, the results remind that a 72 h culture does not influence significantly the spontaneous abnormal karyotype results in this field. Perhaps, the cell proliferating populations at the 48-and 72-h culture period maintain a significant fix result parameter. As there is not much differences in abnormal results, it could be prudent to make advantages of much more mitosis indices of harvested at 72 h.[22] In other words, as many as the chromatid and other abnormal metaphases would be high if the lymphocytes growth times with 2 or more cell cycles growth production.[27,28] In spite of the lymphocyte kinetic findings. Karyotyping research performed on harvest incubated for <48-h cannot be possible owing to the deficit of an available number of chromosome indexes.[22],[29]

In conclusion, these results exhibit correct comparisons among individuals and laboratories to be set up. With effect of these results, it may help in time-consuming and short time period for patient, as well as fresh suggestion for health-care management decision. Reagent, manual, budget, time for diagnosis, and health-care fulfillment may resolve this proposal.

Acknowledgments

We, hereby, would like to express our gratitude to the Research Council of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, for their financial support of this project (Grant number: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1397.558).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Masoudzadeh N, Teimourian S. Comparison of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and karyotype analysis for prenatal screening of chromosomal aneuploidies in 270 amniotic fluid samples. J Perinat Med 2019;47:631-6.
2Fabrice TN, Cherkezyan L, Ringli C, Baroux C. Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging to Analyze Chromatin Density Distribution at the Nanoscale Level. Methods Mol Biol 2018;1675:633-51.
3Battaglia E. Nucleosome and nucleotype: A terminological criticism. Caryologia 2018;47:193-7.
4Guo L, Accorsi A, He S, Guerrero-Hernández C, Sivagnanam S, McKinney S, et al. An adaptable chromosome preparation methodology for use in invertebrate research organisms. BMC Biol 2018;16:25.
5Perkins AT, Bickel SE. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to monitor the state of arm cohesion in prometaphase and metaphase i drosophila oocytes. J Vis Exp 2017;(130):56802. Published online 2017 Dec 6.
6Movafagh A, Varma N, Varma S. Co-expression of two FAB-specific chromosome changes, t(15;17) and t(8;21), in a case of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol 1996;72:375-7.
7Rawojć K, Miszczyk J, Możdżeń A, et al. Evaluation of the premature chromosome condensation scoring protocol after proton and X-ray irradiation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes at high doses range. Int J Radiat Biol 2018;94:1005-996.
8Teye K, Hamada T, Krol RP, Numata S, Ishii N, Matsuda M, et al. Homozygous deletion of six genes including corneodesmosin on chromosome 6p21.3 is associated with generalized peeling skin disease. J Dermatol Sci 2014;75:36-42.
9Zheng J, Yang X, Lu H, Guan Y, Yang F, Xu M. Prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome mosaicism with two marker chromosomes in three cell lines and a review of the literature. Mol Med Rep 2019;19:1791-6.
10Patel A. Chromosomal microarray analysis using array comparative genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Methods Mol Biol 2019;1885:1171-86.
11Nagasaka K, Hossain MJ, Roberti MJ, Ellenberg J, Hirota T. Sister chromatid resolution is an intrinsic part of chromosome organization in prophase. Nat Cell Biol 2016;18:692-9.
12Samra B, Richard-Carpentier G, Kadia TM, Ravandi F, Daver N, DiNardo CD, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype. Blood Cancer J 2020;10:47.
13Liu X, Yu X, Zack DJ, Zhu H, Qian J. TiGER: A database for tissue-specific gene expression and regulation. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:271.
14Nicholson JM, Cimini D. Cancer karyotypes: Survival of the fittest. Front Oncol 2013;3:148.
15Abu-Absi NR, Srienc F. Instantaneous evaluation of mammalian cell culture growth rates through analysis of the mitotic index. J Biotechnol 2002;95:63-84.
16Scarpato R, Migliore L. Comparison of spontaneous structural chromosome aberration frequency in 48 h-cultured human lymphocytes mitotically arrested by different colcemid treatments. Mutat Res 1996;361:35-9.
17Andersson HC. The spontaneous frequency of chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges in cultured peripheral lymphocytes of a single blood donor sampled more than 200 times. Mutat Res 1993;286:281-92.
18Speit G. Does the recommended lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay for human biomonitoring actually detect DNA damage induced by occupational and environmental exposure to genotoxic chemicals? Mutagenesis 2013;28:375-80.
19Ashby J. Comparison of techniques for monitoring human exposure to genotoxic chemicals. Mutat Res 1988;204:543-51.
20Azizi N, Amirouche R, Amirouche N. Karyological investigations and new chromosome number reports in Bellevalia Lapeyrouse, 1808 and Muscari Miller, 1758 (Asparagaceae) from Algeria. Comp Cytogenet 2016;10:171-87. Published online 2016 Mar 21.
21Stevens-Kroef M, Simons A, Rack K, Hastings RJ. Cytogenetic Nomenclature and Reporting. Methods Mol Biol 2017;1541:303-9.
22Sinha AK, Linscombe VA, Gollapudi BB, McClintock ML, Flake RE, Bodner KM. The incidence of spontaneous cytogenetic aberrations in lymphocytes cultured from normal humans for 48 and 72 h. Can J Genet Cytol 1984;26:528-31.
23Salas PC, Vázquez-Rico I, León-Justel A, Carreto-Alba P, Granell-Escobar R. Effectiveness of QF-PCR, karyotyping and microarray in detecting clinically significant chromosomal aberrations of foetuses with abnormal findings on ultrasound. J Mol Genet Med 2018;12:344.
24Casella M, Lucarelli M, Simili M, Beffy P, Del Carratore R, Minichilli F, et al. Spontaneous chromosome loss and colcemid resistance in lymphocytes from patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Cytogenet Genome Res 2003;100:224-9.
25Dutta A, De R, Dolai TK, Mitra PK, Halder A. Cytogenetic study is not essential in patients with aplastic anemia. Am J Blood Res 2017;7:49-58.
26Movafagh A, Mirfakhraei R, Mousavi-Jarrahi A. Frequent incidence of double minute chromosomes in cancers, with special up-to-date reference to leukemia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:3453-6.
27Movafagh A, Maleki F, Fadaie S, Azar Gashb E. Persistent unstable chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of radiotherapy workers after 1st mitotic division in Tehran, Iran. Pakistan J Med Sci 2007;23:254-8.
28Evans HJ, O'Riordan ML. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes for the analysis of chromosome aberrations in mutagen tests. Mutat Res 1975:31:135-48.
29Schoenherr I, Stapp T, Ryll T. A comparison of different methods to determine the end of exponential growth in CHO cell cultures for optimization of scale-up. Biotechnol Prog 2000;16:815-21.