Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 7--12

Association of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D (XPD) gene polymorphism with colorectal cancer risk


Aga Syed Sameer 
 Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Jeddah, KSA

Correspondence Address:
Aga Syed Sameer
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah; King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Jeddah
KSA

Abstract

Background: The xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) gene plays a key role in nucleotide excision repair pathway of the damaged DNA. Genetic polymorphisms in coding region of XPD gene may alter DNA repair capacity of the protein and hence can modulate the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The aim of the study was to determine the genetic association of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism with the risk of CRC development. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty CRC patients and 160 normal controls were assessed for genotype frequencies of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism. We used polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism technique to assess the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism. Results: We observed a significant association (P < 0.05) between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and the risk of developing CRC (P < 0.05). In addition, Gln/Gln genotype of XPD gene doubled the risk for the development of CRC (P < 0.05; odds ratio = 2.25, 95% confidence interval [1.07–4.7]). Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is a significant association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and the risk of CRC.



How to cite this article:
Sameer AS. Association of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D (XPD) gene polymorphism with colorectal cancer risk.Clin Cancer Investig J 2020;9:7-12


How to cite this URL:
Sameer AS. Association of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D (XPD) gene polymorphism with colorectal cancer risk. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 May 29 ];9:7-12
Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2020/9/1/7/282296


Full Text



 Introduction



Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the top most cancers that affect humans, characterized by malignancy of colon or rectal lumen cells.[1] The incidence rate of CRC varies widely across the globe, but it is reported lately that it has been rising on a yearly basis since the last decade.[2] In 2018, CRC became the third common cancer and second most deadly cancer in the world, affecting both genders equally.[3] There is a lot of disparity in CRC incidence geographically; Western countries tend to have the highest incidences of CRC in comparison to the Asian and Middle East countries.[4],[5],[6],[7]

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the important pathways of genome maintenance that is primarily responsible for repairing DNA adducts and other types of damage that cause distortions in the helical structure of DNA.[8],[9] NER pathway requires the involvement of numerous enzymes including xeroderma pigmentosum complementary groups A, C, D, and F (XPA, XPC, XPD, and XPF, respectively), replication protein A, and excision repair cross-complementing 1.[10]

The XPD gene (MIM: 126340; rs13181), also known as excision repair cross -complementation group 2 (ERCC2), is mapped at chromosome 19q13.3 and encodes a helicase that is an essential component of the transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex.[11] XPD protein is unique in having an DNA-dependent ATPase activity and 5'-3' DNA helicase activity, because of which it serves as an essential member of the NER pathway.[11],[12]

NER recognizes and repairs a wide range of structurally unrelated lesions such as bulky adducts, thymidine dimers (ultraviolet [UV] induced) as well as damage by chemotherapy in DNA molecule.[13],[14],[15] XPD protein has ATP-DNA-dependent helicase activity and also acts as a subunit of the basal transcription factor TF2/TFIIH complex.[11] Mutations in the XPD gene have been demonstrated to cause diminished activity of the TFIIH complexes, therefore, increasing the likelihood of repair defects, transcription defects, and abnormal responses to apoptosis.[16] The XPD Lys751Gln single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is attributed to a (A→C) transversion at exon 23 of the gene.[17] It has also been demonstrated that XPD 751Gln/Gln individuals had suboptimal DNA repair capacity in regard to its ability to remove UV photoproducts as compared to the XPD 751 Lys/Lys and Lys/Gln individuals.[18]

Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between XPD gene polymorphism and CRC, whereas some studies found a significant association between the two;[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24] others failed to link them.[25],[26],[27],[28],[29]

In the present study, we conducted a case–control study to find the potential role of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism on the risk of CRC in Kashmiri population. Furthermore, we also investigated an association between the clinic-pathological variables and the XPD Lys751Gln genotypes to ascertain any association.

 Materials and Methods



Subjects

This study included 120 consecutive primary CRC patients from 2012 to date. All CRC patients were recruited from the Department of Surgery of Sher I Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS). Tumor types and stages were determined by two experienced pathologists. The cases who had not received any chemo- or radiotherapy were chosen for this study. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee.

Blood samples of 160 age-matched and sex-matched controls, with no signs of any malignancy, were collected from the outpatient department of the same hospital to serve as controls for the genotypic analysis. Controls represented the patients who visited the outpatient department for the treatment of common ailments such as cold, fever, and urinary tract infection. The mean age of both the patients and the control group was 54 years, and 64 of the patients and 104 of the controls were >50 years of age or older.

Data on all CRC patients were obtained from personal interviews with patients and/or guardians (for those who were illiterate), medical records, and pathology reports. The data collected included sex, age, dwelling, tumor location, Dukes stage, and lymph node status. All patients and/or guardians were informed about the study, and their will to participate in this study was taken on predesigned questionnaire (available on request). The collection and use of tumor and blood samples for this study were previously approved by the appropriate Institutional Ethics Committee in line with the Helsinki declarations.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism

DNA extraction was performed using an ammonium acetate method. One microliter of DNA was used as the template for each polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle.

Analysis of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism was performed using a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Primers for XPD Lys751Gln were forward (F5' GCCCGCTCTGGATTATACG) and reverse (R5' CTATCATCTCCTGGCCCCC), and Pst-I enzyme was used to carry out restriction digestion. PCR was carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 50 ng genomic DNA template, 1X PCR buffer with 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each primer, 50 μM dNTPs, and 0.5 U DNA polymerase. For PCR amplification, the standard program was used as follows: one initial denaturation step at 95°C for 7 min, followed by 35 denaturation cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s of annealing at 57°C, and 30 s of extension at 72°C, followed by a final elongation cycle at 72°C for 7 min.

PCR product of 436 bp for XPD Lys751Gln was digested at 37°C. XPD wild genotype (Lys/Lys) got digested into two bands of 290 bp and 146 bp, XPD (Lys/Gln) heterozygous genotype was identified by four digestion products of 290 bp, 227 bp, 146 bp, and 63 bp, whereas XPD variant (Gln/Gln) produced three digestion bands of 227 bp, 146 bp, and 63 bp.

Statistical analysis

The observed frequencies of the above genotypes in patients with CRC were compared with the controls using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test when the expected frequencies were small. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM, USA; Version 24).

The effective sample size and the statistical power were computed using the “Genetic Power Calculator” developed by Purcell et al. (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~Purcell/gpc/). The statistical power of 80% is widely used in genetic association studies to avoid Type II errors and to determine a cost-effective sample size under the assumption of 10% to 25% variant allele frequency, 1:1 case-to-control ratio, and 5% Type I error rate (α). We obtained a healthy power score of about 85% for the SNP under the study in our case–control study design with 160 cases and 200 controls.

 Results



A total of 120 cases and 160 controls were included in this study with prior consent. Of 120 confirmed cases of CRC, 64 were >50 years old and 56 were ≤50 years of age, 72 were male and 48 were female, 57 were rural and 63 were urban, 53 cases had carcinoma in the colon and 67 in the rectum, and 59 were smokers and 61 nonsmokers. The mean age of patients having confirmed CRC was 54 years. Among controls, 88 consisted of males and 72 females. No significant gender- or age-related differences were observed between the groups (P > 0.05) [Table 1].{Table 1}

Among 120 CRC cases, we found that the frequency of XPD genotype was 51.60% (62/120) for Lys/Lys, 30.0% (36/120) for Lys/Gln, and 14.1% (22/120) for Gln/Gln, whereas the frequency in the general control population was 55.60% (89/160) for Lys/Lys, 35.6% (57/160) for Lys/Gln, and 8.7% (14/160) for Gln/Gln. The overall association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and the CRC cases was found to be significant (P < 0.05) [Table 2]. In addition, Gln/Gln genotype showed a significant doubling of the risk for the development of CRC (odds ratio = 2.25, 95% confidence interval [1.07–4.7]). Furthermore, we found the XPD Gln allele frequency to be about 26% among controls and almost 33% among CRC patients; however, the distribution was not found to be significantly different (P = 0.05) [Table 2].{Table 2}

We also analyzed the correlation of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism with the clinicopathological characteristics and found the Gln/Gln genotype to be significantly associated with the age of the CRC patients (P = 0.01) and involvement of nodes (P = 0.006) [Table 3].{Table 3}

 Discussion



CRC is one of the most frequent common types of malignancy as well as leading cause of death around the world. Incidence rates vary widely according to region. CRC shows considerable variation among racially or ethnically defined populations in multiracial/ethnic countries.[5],[30] Kashmir has a high-incidence area of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancers;[31],[32] wherein CRC represents the third most common GIT cancer.[1],[32]

The XPD protein plays a pivotal role in NER pathway. It participates in the unwinding of the DNA double-stranded helix around the damaged site with its intrinsic helicase activity so as to allow the removal of DNA lesions.[33],[34] XPD helicase is also required for p53-dependent apoptosis and cell cycle regulation.[35]

A number of SNPs have been found in the XPD gene affecting both exonic and intronic regions of the gene. Among all of the SNPs, four result in amino acid changes: (i) isoleucine to methionine in codon 199, (ii) histidine to tyrosine in codon 201, (iii) aspartic acid to asparagine in codon 312, and (iv) lysine to glutamine in codon 751.[17] Of these four, only two SNPs are the most commonly occurring ones – codon 312 and 751.[33]XPD Lys751Gln is one of the most common SNP located in exon 23 of the gene which affects the important domain (C-terminal) of XPD helicase that is known to interact with p44 protein of TFIIH complex. This cross talk stimulates XPD by activating its helicase activity.[16] Therefore, this SNP may affect different protein interactions and hence diminish the activity of TFIIH complexes.[17] In addition, XPD Lys751Gln SNP is also known to reduce the ERCC2 protein expression by decreasing the ERCC2 mRNA stability.[36] Furthermore, it has been also reported that the XPD Lys751 allele is associated with a high level of UVC-induced formation of DNA strand breaks.[37]

In addition, Lunn et al.[38] suggested that XPD Lys752 may alter XPD protein product resulting in the suboptimal repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage. This is the reason why Lys751Gln SNP is the most widely studied polymorphism with regard to its modulation of cancer risk. Lunn et al.[38] studied the functional significance of XPD polymorphisms with respect to chromosome aberrations and reported that individuals with the XPD 751 Lys/Lys genotype had a higher number of chromatid aberrations than those having a 751Gln allele. Possessing a Lys/Lys751 genotype increased the risk of suboptimal DNA repair by almost 7-folds, suggesting that the Lys751 (common) allele may alter the XPD protein product resulting in suboptimal repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage.

A number of studies have investigated the role of DNA repair gene polymorphisms in the patients suffering from CRC in Kashmir province, India.[39],[40],[41],[42] In this hospital-based case–control study of CRC-suffering patients, we found polymorphisms in the pivotal DNA repair gene XPD to be associated with an elevated risk of CRC.

Our results indicate that the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism may predispose our population to the development of CRC (P < 0.05), which is in concordance with many studies reported from different populations worldwide.[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24] However, some of the researchers have reported no significant association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and CRC.[24],[29],[43],[44] Furthermore, in our study, we found the XPD Gln allele frequency to be about 26% among controls and almost 33% among CRC patients, and this frequency is in accordance with the study of Moghtit et al.[27] However, this frequency is lower than that reported by other studies[22],[24],[37],[45],[46],[47],[48] but higher than that reported by other Asian/Caucasian populations.[29],[49],[50]

Two important early meta-analyses – one by Zhang et al.[25] on 11 case–control studies (including a total of 32,961 cases and 4539 controls) and another by Zhang et al.[28] on 15 case–control studies (including a total of 3042 cases and 4627 controls) – did not find any evidence of a link between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and risk of CRC. A recent study by Moghtit et al.[27] on Western Algerian CRC patients (consisting of 129 cases and 148 controls) reported no association of the XPD Lys751Gln with CRC risk. However, the study by Rezaei et al.[22] on Iranian CRC patients (consisting of 88 cases and 88 controls) suggested that the individuals with heterozygous XPD genotype (Lys/Gln) may have an increased susceptibility to CRC compared to other genotypes, and the study of Wang et al. on Indian CRC patients found that XPD 751Gln allele demonstrated the 3.5 times increased risk of rectal cancer.[45]

However, a meta-analysis by Mandal et al.[51] of 13 case–control studies (including 3087 cases and 3599 controls) reported the likely association of the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism with the risk of development of cancer in Indian population. Their meta-analysis concluded that XPD Lys/Gln and XPD Gln/Gln genotypes had had 1.3- and 1.6-fold increased risk of developing cancer as compared with the wild XPD Lys/Lys genotype, respectively. Similarly, another meta-analysis of 37 case–control studies (including 9027 cases and 16072 controls) by Du et al.[26] suggested that the XPD 751Gln/Gln genotype was a low-penetrate risk factor for developing digestive tract cancers, especially in Asian populations.

Acknowledging the relatively limited sample size in the subgroups for the low allelic frequencies, further studies incorporating a larger sample size and/or another ethnic population are needed to confirm the genetic role of DNA repair mechanisms as regards CRC susceptibility.

 Conclusions



This study displays a significantly elevated risk for CRC in individuals with XPD Gln/Gln genotypes, thereby suggesting that the key enzymes of DNA repair pathway are modulating the risk of developing CRC in Kashmiri population with almost two and half times than Lys/Lys genotype.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank every CRC patient who took part in this study and cooperated during the interview and sample collection. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of Dr. Nissar A Chowdri, Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS, Soura, Kashmir, for providing the CRC samples for this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Sameer AS. Colorectal cancer: Molecular mutations and polymorphisms. Front Oncol 2013;3:114.
2Weinberg BA, Marshall JL, Salem ME. The growing challenge of young adults with colorectal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2017;31:381-9.
3Globocan; 2018a. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Nov 25].
4Globocan; 2018b. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/10_8_9-Colorectum-fact-sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Nov 25].
5Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RG, Barzi A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:177-93.
6Kuipers EJ, Grady WM, Lieberman D, Seufferlein T, Sung JJ, Boelens PG, et al. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015;1:15065.
7Al-Ahwal MS, Shafik YH, Al-Ahwal HM. First national survival data for colorectal cancer among Saudis between 1994 and 2004: What's next? BMC Public Health 2013;13:73.
8Michailidi C, Papavassiliou AG, Troungos C. DNA repair mechanisms in colorectal carcinogenesis. Curr Mol Med 2012;12:237-46.
9Sancar A, Tang M. Nucleotide excision repair. Photochem Photobiol 1993;57:905-21.
10Chiang CC, Tsai YY, Bau DT, Cheng YW, Tseng SH, Wang RF, et al. Pterygium and genetic polymorphisms of the DNA repair enzymes XRCC1, XPA, and XPD. Mol Vis 2010;16:698-704.
11Sung P, Bailly V, Weber C, Thompson LH, Prakash L, Prakash S. Human xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene encodes a DNA helicase. Nature 1993;365:852-5.
12Hoeijmakers JH, Egly JM, Vermeulen W. TFIIH: A key component in multiple DNA transactions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996;6:26-33.
13Weeda G, Hoeijmakers JH. Genetic analysis of nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells. Semin Cancer Biol 1993;4:105-17.
14Schaeffer L, Moncollin V, Roy R, Staub A, Mezzina M, Sarasin A, et al. The ERCC2/DNA repair protein is associated with the class II BTF2/TFIIH transcription factor. EMBO J 1994;13:2388-92.
15Braithwaite E, Wu X, Wang Z. Repair of DNA lesions: Mechanisms and relative repair efficiencies. Mutat Res 1999;424:207-19.
16Coin F, Bergmann E, Tremeau-Bravard A, Egly JM. Mutations in XPB and XPD helicases found in xeroderma pigmentosum patients impair the transcription function of TFIIH. EMBO J 1999;18:1357-66.
17Shen MR, Jones IM, Mohrenweiser H. Nonconservative amino acid substitution variants exist at polymorphic frequency in DNA repair genes in healthy humans. Cancer Res 1998;58:604-8.
18Qiao Y, Spitz MR, Shen H, Guo Z, Shete S, Hedayati M, et al. Modulation of repair of ultraviolet damage in the host-cell reactivation assay by polymorphic XPC and XPD/ERCC2 genotypes. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:295-9.
19Paszkowska-Szczur K, Scott RJ, Górski B, Cybulski C, Kurzawski G, Dymerska D, et al. Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes and susceptibility to colorectal cancer in the Polish population. Mol Biol Rep 2015;42:755-64.
20Procopciuc LM, Osian G. Lys751Gln XPD and Arg399Gln XRCC1 in Romanians. Association with sporadic colorectal cancer risk and different stages of carcinomas. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2013;108:711-8.
21Gan Y, Li XR, Chen DJ, Wu JH. Association between polymorphisms of XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln genes and prognosis of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:5721-4.
22Rezaei H, Motovali-Bashi M, Khodadad K, Elahi A, Emami H, Naddaffnia H. Relationship between XPD Lys 751 Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in a population-based study. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2013;6:18-24.
23Huang MY, Wang JY, Huang ML, Chang HJ, Lin SR. Polymorphisms in XPD and ERCC1 associated with colorectal cancer outcome. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14:4121-34.
24Skjelbred CF, Saebø M, Wallin H, Nexø BA, Hagen PC, Lothe IM, et al. Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes and risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, in a Norwegian cohort: A case control study. BMC Cancer 2006;6:67.
25Zhang T, Zhang DM, Zhao D, Hou XM, Ma SC, Liu XJ. Lack of association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:1255-60.
26Du H, Guo N, Shi B, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Lu K, et al. The effect of XPD polymorphisms on digestive tract cancers risk: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e96301.
27Moghtit FZ, Aberkane MS, Le Morvan V, Louhibi L, Bellot R, Bousahba A, et al. No association between XRCC3 Thr241Met and XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms and the risk of colorectal cancer in West Algerian population: A case-control study. Med Oncol 2014;31:942.
28Zhang Y, Ding D, Wang X, Zhu Z, Huang M, He X. Lack of association between XPD Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:1257-64.
29Yeh CC, Sung FC, Tang R, Chang-Chieh CR, Hsieh LL. Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD genes, and colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in Taiwan. BMC Cancer 2005;5:12.
30Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends – An update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:16-27.
31Rasool MT, Lone MM, Wani ML, Afroz F, Zaffar S, Mohib-ul Haq M. Cancer in Kashmir, India: Burden and pattern of disease. J Cancer Res Ther 2012;8:243-6.
32Sameer AS. Colorectal cancer: A researcher's perspective of the molecular angel's gone eccentric in the Vale of Kashmir. Tumour Biol 2013;34:1301-15.
33Benhamou S, Sarasin A. ERCC2/XPD gene polymorphisms and cancer risk. Mutagenesis 2002;17:463-9.
34Lehmann AR. The xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) gene: One gene, two functions, three diseases. Genes Dev 2001;15:15-23.
35Wang XW, Vermeulen W, Coursen JD, Gibson M, Lupold SE, Forrester K, et al. The XPB and XPD DNA helicases are components of the p53-mediated apoptosis pathway. Genes Dev 1996;10:1219-32.
36Moisan F, Laroche-Clary A, Auzanneau C, Ricard N, Pourquier P, Robert J, et al. Deciphering the role of the ERCC2 gene polymorphism on anticancer drug sensitivity. Carcinogenesis 2012;33:962-8.
37Møller P, Wallin H, Dybdahl M, Frentz G, Nexø BA. Psoriasis patients with basal cell carcinoma have more repair-mediated DNA strand-breaks after UVC damage in lymphocytes than psoriasis patients without basal cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett 2000;151:187-92.
38Lunn RM, Helzlsouer KJ, Parshad R, Umbach DM, Harris EL, Sanford KK, et al. XPD polymorphisms: Effects on DNA repair proficiency. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:551-5.
39Nissar S, Baba SM, Akhter T, Rasool R, Shah ZA, Sameer AS. RAD51 polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer: A case control study in Kashmiri population. Eur J Cancer Prev 2014;23:264-8.
40Nissar S, Lone TA, Banday MZ, Rasool R, Chowdri NA, Parray FQ, et al. XRCC1 Arg 399 Gln polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer: A case control study in Kashmiri population. Oncol Lett 2013;5:959-63.
41Nissar S, Sameer AS, Lone TA, Chowdri NA, Rasool R. XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in Kashmir: A case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:9621-5.
42Nissar S, Sameer AS, Rasool R, Chowdri NA, Rashid F. Polymorphism of the DNA repair gene XRCC1 (Arg194Trp) and its role in colorectal cancer in Kashmiri population: A case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:6385-90.
43Mort R, Mo L, McEwan C, Melton DW. Lack of involvement of nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:333-7.
44Stern MC, Conti DV, Siegmund KD, Corral R, Yuan JM, Koh WP, et al. DNA repair single-nucleotide polymorphisms in colorectal cancer and their role as modifiers of the effect of cigarette smoking and alcohol in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:2363-72.
45Wang J, Zhao Y, Jiang J, Gajalakshmi V, Kuriki K, Nakamura S, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD, and colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in an Indian population. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010;136:1517-25.
46Ben Salah G, Fendri-Kriaa N, Kamoun H, Kallabi F, Mkaouar-Rebai E, Fourati A, et al. An interethnic variability and a functional prediction of DNA repair gene polymorphisms: The example of XRCC3 (p. Thr241 & Met) and XPD (p. Lys751 and Gln) in a healthy Tunisian population. Mol Biol Rep 2012;39:9639-47.
47Hansen RD, Sørensen M, Tjønneland A, Overvad K, Wallin H, Raaschou-Nielsen O, et al. XPA A23G, XPC Lys939Gln, XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms, interactions with smoking, alcohol and dietary factors, and risk of colorectal cancer. Mutat Res 2007;619:68-80.
48Engin AB, Karahalil B, Engin A, Karakaya AE. Oxidative stress, Helicobacter pylori, and OGG1 Ser326Cys, XPC Lys939Gln, and XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms in a Turkish population with colorectal carcinoma. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010;14:559-64.
49Ouyang FD, Yang FL, Chen HC, Khan MA, Huang FM, Wan XX, et al. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XPD, XRCC1, and OGG1, and lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility in Chinese population. Tumour Biol 2013;34:2843-8.
50Park JY, Lee SY, Jeon HS, Park SH, Bae NC, Lee EB, et al. Lys751Gln polymorphism in the DNA repair gene XPD and risk of primary lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2002;36:15-6.
51Mandal RK, Yadav SS, Panda AK. Meta-analysis on the association of nucleotide excision repair gene XPD A751C variant and cancer susceptibility among Indian population. Mol Biol Rep 2014;41:713-9.