|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 227-231
Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix
Shakti Kumar Yadav, Alekh Verma, Namrata Sarin, Sompal Singh
Department of Pathology, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College and Hindu Rao Hospital, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||19-Nov-2019|
Department of Pathology, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College and Hindu Rao Hospital, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Context: Cervical cancer is one of the most important cancer deaths among females. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a role in cell differentiation, cell motility, neovascularization, invasion, metastasis, and resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies have shown better response in various invasive tumors. Aims: The aim of the study is to evaluate EGFR expression in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix and to assess its relation to tumor characteristics. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective, case–control study. Subjects and Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 30 cases with SCC along with 20 age-matched cases with normal cervix as controls were obtained from the archives. EGFR expression was analyzed in both cases and controls. Statistical Analysis Used: The Chi-square test was used to compare and find the association between the variables. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Strong EGFR expression was present in 93.4% of the cases, while 6.6% of cases showed moderate expression. Strong EGFR expression was associated with the tumor size of >4 cm size. There was no association of EGFR expression with tumor grade, tumor stage, and lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: The present study showed that a significantly higher number of cases of invasive SCC of uterine cervix show increased EGFR expression. The EGFR expression is associated with tumor size.
Keywords: Carcinoma, cervix, epidermal growth factor receptor, squamous
|How to cite this article:|
Yadav SK, Verma A, Sarin N, Singh S. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Investig J 2019;8:227-31
|How to cite this URL:|
Yadav SK, Verma A, Sarin N, Singh S. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 2];8:227-31. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2019/8/6/227/271313
| Introduction|| |
Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of deaths related to cancer among females in developing countries. Today, majority (80%) of the females dying due to cervical cancer live in developing countries. It is curable in early stages, but prognosis for advanced stages of the disease is very poor.
It arises in the form of precursor lesions, i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) which is closely associated with infection by various strains of human papillomavirus, namely 16, 18, 31, 13, 33, and 51. Genetic modifications leading to the expression of oncoproteins play an important role in the pathogenesis of tumors. Analysis of these oncoproteins may lead to discovery of potential targets for anticancer therapies.
Radiation had been the gold standard therapy for cervical cancers for many decades. Currently, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy has been considered as the standard therapeutic modality for locally advanced cervical cancers., However, such treatment options remain suboptimal with residual tumor observed in as much as 40%–50% of cases. Patients presenting with recurrent or metastatic tumors have limited treatment options  and in such cases the 5-year survival is <5%.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been known to play a role in cell differentiation, enhancement of cell motility, protein secretion, neovascularization, invasion, metastasis, and resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation.,
EGFR is a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein receptor encoded by the HER1 proto-oncogene located on chromosome 7p12. EGFR is synthesized from a 1210 residue polypeptide precursor after cleavage of the N-terminal sequence; an 1186 residue protein is inserted into the cell membrane.
EGFR is present in many normal tissues and expressed in a wide variety of solid tumors. EGFR is normally expressed in the cytoplasm and the membrane of the cells in the basal layer of various epithelial membranes. In cervical cancer, the range has been reported to be anywhere from 6% to 90% of cases.
The current standard of cancer therapy is receptor-mediated tumor-targeted radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which is based on the delivery of therapeutically relevant drugs directly to disseminated tumor cells, with hopefully minimal damage to normal tissues.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as erlotinib and newer targeted therapy drugs against EGFR receptors such as cetuximab and panitumumab have been approved for use in various primary and metastatic colon cancers ,, and nonsmall cell lung cancers.
The expression of EGFR in cervical cancer has rarely been studied. The present study was carried out with the aim to evaluate the expression of EGFR oncoprotein in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix and to find out its association with various tumor characteristics and to compare the expression with normal control subjects.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of tissue from 30 cases with SCC of uterine cervix were obtained from the departmental histopathology archives. Twenty age-matched cases of normal cervix, removed for lesions other than those related to cervix (mostly leiomyoma) were taken as controls. Clinical and demographic details of all patients were retrieved from the records. Staging of the SCC cases was done according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical tumors.
Sections were stained by hematoxylin and eosin staining for histological examination. Cases were graded into well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated SCC.
Immunohistochemical staining was done on 5-μm tissue sections taken on poly-L-lysine coated slides. EGFR immunostaining was done using polymer-Horse-raddish peroxidase detection kit, (Biogenex, USA). For positive control, tissue from SCC of lung positive for EGFR was used. Level of EGFR expression was evaluated using a semi-quantitative method with regard to the intensity of staining and the percentage of positive tumor cells. Intensity of staining was scored on a scale of 0–3 as: 0 (no color), 1 (slightly brown), 2 (brown), and 3 (dark brown). The percentage of positively stained cell was scored on a scale of 0–3 as: 0 (no stained cells), 1 (1%–<50% stained cells), 2 (51%–80% stained cells), and 3 (more than 80% stained cells). Intensity and percentage scores were added and final score was calculated using these score and four categories were identified as: negative (0), weak positive (1–2), moderately positive (3–4), and strongly positive (5–6). The Chi-square test was used to compare and find the association between the variables. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
The mean age of the study group was 48.13 ± 7.81 years and that of control group was 44.00 ± 7.52 years.
Cases were categorized according to tumor characteristics and shown in [Table 1] and [Figure 1]. The tumor size was found to be <4 cm among 53.3%. Cases with moderately differentiated carcinoma were 66.7% followed by poorly differentiated (20%) and well differentiated (13.3%). The lymph, node, metastasis was found in 46.5% of the cases. FIGO stage IB1 was observed in 53.3% of the cases.
EGFR immunoexpression was present in both cases and control groups. No case or control tissue was found as negative or weakly positive for EGFR expression. Moderate expression (2+) was seen in 6.6% cases, while strong expression was present in 93.4% cases in the study group [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b. In the control group, moderate EGFR expression was seen in 60% and strong expression in 40% controls [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b. This difference in EGFR expression was significantly different (P < 0.001) between study and control groups [Table 2].
|Figure 2: (a) Photomicrograph of moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma showing strong positivity with epidermal growth factor receptor (epidermal growth factor receptor, DAB, ×100), (b) Photomicrograph of moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma showing strong positivity with epidermal growth factor receptor (epidermal growth factor receptor, DAB, ×40)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: (a) Photomicrograph of chronic cervicitis showing moderate positivity with epidermal growth factor receptor (epidermal growth factor receptor, DAB, ×400), (b) Photomicrograph of chronic cervicitis showing strong positivity with epidermal growth factor receptor (epidermal growth factor receptor, DAB, ×400)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor expression scores between cases and controls|
Click here to view
Study group data were analyzed to find the association of tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, and FIGO stage with EGFR expression. Tumor size was significantly associated (P < 0.001) with the strong EGFR expression [Table 3]. We did not find any association of EGFR expression with histological grade, lymph node metastasis, and FIGO stage of the tumor [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6].
|Table 3: Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor expression with tumor size|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor expression with histological grade|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Comparison of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage with epidermal growth factor receptor expression|
Click here to view
|Table 6: Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor expression scores according to lymph node metastasis|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Cervical cancer being one of the most prevalent cancers among Indian females, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among females.
Many studies of EGFR in normal and dysplastic epithelium have shown contradictory results. Normally, EGFR is expressed in the basal cells of the ectocervical epithelium, and the intensity of expression may vary from mild to strong. As cells differentiate, the EGFR expression shifts from membranous to cytoplasmic, which is also evident in the present study. Soonthornthum et al. have shown that the intensity of EGFR expression in more in higher grades of CIN, and it is also associated with HPV infection.
In the present study, we found that 3+ EGFR expression was present in significantly higher (P < 0.001) number of cases (96%) compared to controls. Kim et al. compared EGFR expression between invasive cervical cancer and normal cervix found that invasive cervical cancer had significantly higher expression of EGFR as compared to control group. Li et al. found that EGFR expression was present in the basal layer of the ectocervical epithelium. They also compared EGFR expression in SCC and CIN. They found that EGFR expression gradually increased from normal to low-grade to high-grade CIN and subsequently to invasive carcinoma. The difference in expression was not significant between high-grade CIN and invasive carcinoma. However, similar to our findings, the EGFR expression was significantly higher in cases with invasive SCC. Shen et al. reported that EGFR overexpression (2+ or 3+) was found in 64% (35/53) of the primary cervical tumors. The difference in the findings may be explained by different methods and probably also different evaluation of the immunohistochemical staining.
We found that 26 out of 30 cases had tumor size >4 cm, out of these 16 cases showed 3+ EGFR expression, while 10 showed 2+, i.e., moderated expression. Tumor size was found to be associated with higher expression of EGFR (P < 0.03).
In the present study, EGFR expression score was higher in all grades of tumor (well, moderately, and poorly differentiated). Li et al. compared degree of differentiation and EGFR expression and found that cases with both high and low degree of differentiation showed EGFR expression. Most cases, i.e., 5 out of 9 cases (55%) with higher differentiation and 9 out 15 cases (60%) with lower degree of differentiation has 2+–3+ EGFR immunoexpression. However, similar to our study, these differences were not statistically significant.
Out of 30 cases of SCC, all the cases of lymph node metastasis showed 3 + EGFR expression, while 90% cases without lymph node metastasis showed strong 3+ EGFR immunoexpression. Li et al. found that out 19 cases with lymph node metastasis; three had 3+ and seven had 2+ EGFR expression, while four cases had 1+ and five cases negative immunostaining. Out of five node-negative cases, two cases have 3+ and 2+ and one case had 1+ expression. Shen et al. found that 60% (32/53) of the cases with corresponding lymph node metastases showed 3+ EGFR expression. Similar to our study, in both the studies the EGFR expression was not associated with lymph node metastasis.
In the present study, we found no significant difference in EGFR expression between tumor of different clinical FIGO stages. Similar to our study, Kim et al. also found that EGFR expression was not significantly different among various FIGO stages. Kristensen et al. also did not find any association of tumor grade, stage, and lymph node status with EGFR expression.
The findings of the present study may be limited by its low sample size; however, it is suggested that a more extensive study taking a larger sample size might be needed to validate the findings of the present study.
| Conclusions|| |
The present study showed that a significantly higher number of cases of invasive SCC of uterine cervix show increased EGFR expression. The EGFR expression is associated with tumor size. The present study supports the thought that use of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies against certain subset of cervical SCC can act as a potential therapeutic option.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Denny L. Cervical cancer: Prevention and treatment. Discov Med 2012;14:125-31.
Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics: Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyons, France: IARC Press; 2003.
Long HJ 3rd
, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr., Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, et al.
Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4626-33.
Califano D, Losito S, Pisano C, Santelli G, Greggi S, Iodice F, et al.
Significance of erb-B2 immunoreactivity in cervical cancer. Front Biosci 2006;11:2071-6.
Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, Levenback C, Grigsby PW, Cooper J, et al.
Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:872-80.
Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, Symonds P, Fresco L, Collingwood M, et al.
Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001;358:781-6.
Classe JM, Rauch P, Rodier JF, Morice P, Stoeckle E, Lasry S, et al.
Surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: Morbidity and outcome: Results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des chirurgiens de centre de lutte contre le cancer). Gynecol Oncol 2006;102:523-9.
Lenhard RE Jr., Osteen RT, Gansler T. The American Cancwer Society's Clinical Oncology. New York, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2000.
Huang SM, Harari PM. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in cancer therapy: Biology, rationale and preliminary clinical results. Invest New Drugs 1999;17:259-69.
Wells A. EGF receptor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1999;31:637-43.
Jorissen RN, Walker F, Pouliot N, Garrett TP, Ward CW, Burgess AW. Epidermal growth factor receptor: Mechanisms of activation and signalling. Exp Cell Res 2003;284:31-53.
Baselga J. Why the epidermal growth factor receptor? The rationale for cancer therapy. Oncologist 2002;7 Suppl 4:2-8.
Berchuck A, Rodriguez G, Kamel A, Soper JT, Clarke-Pearson DL, Bast RC Jr. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HER-2/neu in normal and neoplastic cervix, vulva, and vagina. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:381-7.
Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, et al.
Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1466-75.
Messersmith WA, Ahnen DJ. Targeting EGFR in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1834-6.
Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, et al.
Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1408-17.
Zer A, Leighl N. Promising targets and current clinical trials in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Front Oncol 2014;4:329.
Wells M, Ostor AG, Crum CP, Franceschi S, Tommasino M, Nesland JM, et al
. Epithelial tumors of the uterine cervix. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2003. p. 221-32.
Li Q, Tang Y, Cheng X, Ji J, Zhang J, Zhou X. EGFR protein expression and gene amplification in squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7:733-41.
Shanta V, Krishnamurthi S, Gajalakshmi CK, Swaminathan R, Ravichandran K. Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix: Global and national perspective. J Indian Med Assoc 2000;98:49-52.
Soonthornthum T, Arias-Pulido H, Joste N, Lomo L, Muller C, Rutledge T, et al.
Epidermal growth factor receptor as a biomarker for cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 2011;22:2166-78.
Kim JW, Kim YT, Kim DK, Song CH, Lee JW. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:283-7.
Shen L, Shui Y, Wang X, Sheng L, Yang Z, Xue D, et al.
EGFR and HER2 expression in primary cervical cancers and corresponding lymph node metastases: Implications for targeted radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2008;8:232.
Kristensen GB, Holm R, Abeler VM, Tropé CG. Evaluation of the prognostic significance of cathepsin D, epidermal growth factor receptor, and c-erbB-2 in early cervical squamous cell carcinoma. An immunohistochemical study. Cancer 1996;78:433-40.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]