Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 1434
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 305-308

Defining the T status in breast cancer: Where do we stand?


Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre for Oncology, Government Royapettah Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramamurthy Rajaraman
Government Royapettah Hospital, “RAMA SWATHI,” 11/25, 7th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 600 028, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.183495

Rights and Permissions

Background: Tumor size in breast cancer is a key factor for staging, prognosticating, and deciding the choice of treatment. Currently, there are no standard rules for measuring the T status in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine an accurate method to evaluate the T status by various parameters compared with the actual size in fresh specimens. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 134 breast cancer patients scheduled to undergo a modified radical mastectomy. The paired t-test was used for analyses. Results: Using a paired t-test, the differences in tumor size as measured by physical examination (P ≤ 0.001) and in the formalin-fixed specimen (P ≤ 0.001) when compared with the postoperative fresh specimen were highly significant. These differences indicated that the physical examination and formalin-fixed specimen measurements were inaccurate in estimating tumor size. Tumor size, as measured by a mammogram and ultrasonogram when compared with the referenced P= 0.077 and 0.149, respectively, showed that the ultrasonogram is the most accurate method of determining tumor size in vivo. The mean percentage decrease in size of the formalin-fixed specimen was 7.8, which was significant enough to downstage two patients from T2 to T1 and seven patients from T3 to T2. Conclusion: An ultrasonogram is the most accurate way of defining tumor size in vivo as measured in postoperative fresh specimens. Tumor shrinkage with formalin fixation may give a false T status.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1303    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal