|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 193-195
Microfilariae coexistent with the cytology of adenocarcinoma gall bladder: An unnoticed comorbidity
Sunita Bika1, Vanita Kumar1, Sonam Dubey1, Akhil Kapoor2, Harvindra Singh Kumar2
1 Department of Pathology, Sardar Patel Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Acharya Tulsi Regional Cancer Treatment and Research Institute, Sardar Patel Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Mar-2016|
Room No. 73, P.G. Medical Hostel, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner - 334 003, Rajasthan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Lymphatic filariasis is endemic in 250 districts in 20 states and union territories of India. Microfilariae have been reported in body cavity fluids and cytological evaluation of various lesions including benign as well as malignant neoplasms. Here, we present a rare case of incidentally found microfilariae in a cytological smear from gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Along with supporting the cytology as an important tool in detection of asymptomatic filariasis, we wish to draw the attention toward a more dedicated approach to eliminate this disease entity and toward unnoticed comorbidities in carcinoma patients.
Keywords: Comorbidity, elimination, gallbladder carcinoma, microfilariae
|How to cite this article:|
Bika S, Kumar V, Dubey S, Kapoor A, Kumar HS. Microfilariae coexistent with the cytology of adenocarcinoma gall bladder: An unnoticed comorbidity. Clin Cancer Investig J 2016;5:193-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Bika S, Kumar V, Dubey S, Kapoor A, Kumar HS. Microfilariae coexistent with the cytology of adenocarcinoma gall bladder: An unnoticed comorbidity. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Oct 20];5:193-5. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2016/5/2/193/176240
| Introduction|| |
The incidental finding of microfilariae in various benign cytologic smears is very common. Microfilariae in malignant effusions have also been reported, but their coexistence with solid malignant tumor at the primary site has been reported only very rarely. The term “lymphatic filariasis” covers infection with three closely related nematode worms Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and Brugia timori. It is a global problem and a major social and economic scourge in tropics and subtropics. The disease manifestations range from none to both acute and chronic manifestations. Though not fatal, the disease is responsible for considerable suffering, deformity, and disability. In India, W. Bancrofti is the causative agent for 98% cases of lymphatic filariasis, and B. Malayi is for the rest 2%. Both have nocturnal periodicity making it very hard to detect microfilariae in routine peripheral blood smears. Though India is an endemic region for filariasis, still finding microfilaria in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears is quite unusual. The probability of coexistence of microfilaria and neoplastic lesion is also very low. Hence, we are reporting a rare case, in which cytological smear of gall bladder lump diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, showed microfilariae incidentally.
| Case Report|| |
A 35-year-old female complaining of pain abdomen for 2 months and abdominal distention for 10 days presented in our institute. A lump found in right hypochondrium in a location suggestive of gall bladder lump while examined clinically. Ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen revealed a heterogeneous mass in gallbladder fossa. Her USG-guided FNAC was done with a 26 gauge needle fitted to a 10 mL disposable syringe under aseptic conditions. Aspirate was smeared on glass slides, air dried and stained by Leishman-Giemsa stain. Microscopic examination [Figure 1] of smears revealed loose clusters of malignant epithelial cells [Figure 2] in the acinar and papillary pattern. In one of the smear, parasite having sheathed appearance, multiple, coarse, discrete nuclei extending from the head to tail except at the small terminal portion of the caudal end seen and identified as microfilariae of W. bancrofti. A diagnosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma with microfilaria of Wuchereria was offered. Later on, the patient was approached to prepare repeated day time and night time smears as well. Where day smears demonstrated leukocytosis and eosinophilia only, night smears were positive for microfilariae [Figure 3].
|Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing a cluster of epithelial cells (upper left) and microfilariae (lower right) in the same field (Leishman and Giemsa stain, ×40)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing cluster of malignant epithelial cells (Leishman and Giemsa stain, ×400)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing microfilaria in night smear (Leishman and Giemsa stain, ×400)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Being considered as a potentially eradicable disease by the international task force for disease eradication, subclinical cases or careers of filariasis must receive thorough attention. In India, 2016 is the informal target date for interrupting transmission.
Man as definitive and mosquito as intermediate host is required to complete the life cycle of W. bancrofti. Adult worms live in lymph nodes where the gravid females release microfilariae, which circulate in the peripheral circulation.
Bancroftian filariasis causes a wide range of clinical manifestation. Acute phase is characterized by fever, lymphangitis, lymphadenitis, epididymo-orchitis, and funniculitis. Chronic stage is manifested as lymphadenopathy, lymphedema, hydrocele, and elephantiasis. A significant number of infected individuals remain asymptomatic throughout their lives. The presence of microfilaria in almost all types of body fluids are reported. Getting microfilariae in tissues in association with neoplastic lesions is also not that strange. Microfilaria is detected by FNAC at different, unusual sites such as breast, thyroid, lymph nodes, liver, lung, salivary glands, cutaneous nodules, soft tissue nodule, oral and skin ulcers and also in bone marrow aspirates, joint aspirates, and other body fluids.
Coexistence of microfilaria with various neoplasms (hemangioma of the liver, Ewing's sarcoma of bones, squamous cell carcinoma of maxillary antrum, anaplastic astrocytoma of the thalamus, nonHodgkin's lymphoma, dentigerous cyst, carcinoma breast, and cervical carcinoma) has been reported by different cytopathologists. Only few cases, (to best of our knowledge two cases prior to this case) documenting association of filariasis with gallbladder carcinoma are present in the literature; one by Jha et al. and another one by Varghese et al. In the retrospective study carried out by Jha et al. in cytology department of a teaching medical college, 14 cases of cytological specimen out of 4291 (0.3%) showed microfilaria; 12 cases were from FNAC from different sites and 2 cases were from pleural fluid. Two cases showed ova in addition to microfilaria and one of them in addition showed fragment of adult worm. Microfilaria in 4 cases of FNAC and one case of pleural fluid were associated with malignant cells. In a case report by Varghese et al., microfilaria were detected in an ultrasound guided fine-needle aspirate of gallbladder lump diagnosed as gallbladder adenocarcinoma which is quite similar to our case.
| Conclusion|| |
This case report highlights not only the rarity of association but also emphasizes that co-morbidities usually remain unnoticed under the aura of major diagnosis as carcinoma. Such case reports having coexistent filariasis may increase the awareness toward such possibilities and may improve management as well. Furthermore, cytology can be a valuable tool to demonstrate microfilaria in clinically unsuspected cases or in carriers. Preparation of night smears gets ignored in unsuspected cases making detection of carriers a great obstacle to eradication of filariasis.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chowdhary M, Langer S, Aggarwal M, Agarwal C. Microfilaria in thyroid gland nodule. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008;51:94-6.
Park K. Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 22nd
ed. India: M/S Banarsidas Bhanot Publisher; 2013. p. 245-50.
Phukan JP, Sinha A, Sengupta S, Bose K. Cytodiagnosis of filariasis from a swelling of arm. Trop Parasitol 2012;2:77-9.
Sivakumar S. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in detection of microfilariae: Report of 2 cases. Acta Cytol 2007;51:803-6.
Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R. Microfilariae in cytologic smears: A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40:299-301.
Sabesan S, Raju HK, Srividya A, Das PK. Delimitation of lymphatic filariasis transmission risk areas: A geo-environmental approach. Filaria J 2006;5:12.
Nutman TB, Kumaraswami V. Regulation of the immune response in lymphatic filariasis: Perspectives on acute and chronic infection with Wuchereria bancrofti
in South India. Parasite Immunol 2001;23:389-99.
Pantola C, Kala S, Agarwal A, Khan L. Microfilaria in cytological smears at rare sites coexisting with unusual pathology: A series of seven cases. Trop Parasitol 2012;2:61-3.
Jha A, Shrestha R, Aryal G, Pant AD, Adhikari RC, Sayami G. Cytological diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis in lesions clinically anticipated as neoplastic. Nepal Med Coll J 2008;10:108-14.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]