Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 230
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 483-486

Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A diagnostic dilemma


Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, YMT Dental College and PG Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication2-Jul-2015

Correspondence Address:
Swati Deshmane
A/P-Patan, Patan, Satara - 415 206, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.159708

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Oral leukoplakia is one of the most common potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity. Many variants of oral leukoplakia exist, with oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (OPVL) being one. OPVL, a slow growing, long-term progressive lesion was first described in 1985 by Hansen et al. It is an aggressive form of oral leukoplakia with multifocal presentation, high rates of malignant transformation and recurrence. It is a rare clinico-pathological entity, which remains an enigma even today. The term proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) has been the subject of an ongoing discussion with regard to its definition. Its etiology too remains unclear until date. Tobacco use does not seem to have a significant influence on the appearance or progression of PVL. These lesions are known to occur in both smokers and nonsmokers. In the light of current information available, this article describes the etiology, clinical aspects, histological features, and various diagnostic criteria of OPVL.

Keywords: Hyperkeratosis, oral leukoplakia, oral proliferative leukoplakia, potentially malignant disorder


How to cite this article:
Khot K, Deshmane S. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A diagnostic dilemma. Clin Cancer Investig J 2015;4:483-6

How to cite this URL:
Khot K, Deshmane S. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A diagnostic dilemma. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 7];4:483-6. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2015/4/4/483/159708


  Introduction Top


Oral cancer is among the ten most common cancers worldwide, with a wide geographical variation in its incidence. [1] The cause of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is multifactorial. Many OSCCs seem to be associated with or preceded by premalignant lesions, especially leukoplakia. Leukoplakia is defined as "a white plaque of questionable risk, having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer." [2] Leukoplakia was described by the World Health Organization as a "precancerous lesion." However, more recently it has been suggested that the terms "premalignant" and "precancerous" should be substituted for "potentially malignant," and that all precancerous lesions and conditions should be grouped under the common name of "potentially malignant disorders." [3] Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) was first described by Hansen et al. in 1985 [4] as a long-term progressive condition, which develops initially as a white plaque of hyperkeratosis that eventually becomes a multifocal disease. As there are no particular differences between the pathological changes of PVL and those of oral verrucous leukoplakia (OVL), the characteristics of its clinical and pathological progress are considered vital bases for the diagnosis of PVL. [5] The premalignant capacity of PVL is higher than the one observed in "common leukoplakia." Therefore, the early diagnosis of this pathology plays a crucial role when trying to prevent a malignant transformation in PVL or at least when trying to prevent the development of carcinomas.


  Etiopathogenesis Top


Oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (OPVL) is a rare clinico-pathological entity, which remains an enigma even today. Also factors responsible for its development are unclear. Tobacco use does not seem to have a significant influence on the disease because PVL occurs both in smokers as well as in nonsmokers. [6] However, cases reported in the literature seem to implicate immune factors. Enhancing the patient's immunity and topical therapies are known to have a positive effect. There are some reported cases of patients with PVL after bone-marrow transplantation (BMT) supporting this impression. [7] BMT involves an immunosuppressive step, and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a malignancy that can occur after BMT. [8] This indicates that immunity plays a significant role in PVL, as in OSCC. Also, epidemiological data have demonstrated a high incidence of PVL in elderly women, with no history of tobacco or alcohol consumption. This could be attributed to lower immunity in women as compared to men and also decreased immunity with age. [8] Some authors have also reported an association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and PVL [9] particularly HPV16 and HPV18. Historically, it has been postulated that HPV infection begins with the inoculation of virus into an interruption of epithelium and the interaction with a putative specific cellular receptor. The early viral gene products stimulate cell growth in the basal layer, leading to epithelial proliferation and formation of an exophytic lesion. [10] Between 0% and 89% OPVL are reported to be HPV-positive. [11] However, HPV were found in only a small number of cases, and other authors have been unable to find any such association. For example, Campisi et al. using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) - a sensitive technique-studied 58 cases of PVL compared with 90 cases of other oral leukoplakias and concluded that PVL is not more likely to be associated with HPV infection than is conventional leukoplakia. Using PCR, we also could not find an association. [12] Jose Bagan et al. in their study detected Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in PVL and also in a higher percentage of patients with PVL associated OSCC as compared to OSCC without PVL. However, they did not find any evidence of any direct role of this virus in the etiology. [12] PVL patients infected with HPV or EBV might be immunocompromised like human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. [8] Silverman et al. reported 68% of PVL patients to be positive for Candida albicans but did not find the fungal infection to be linked to PVL occurrence or it is progression to carcinoma. [13] Recently, it has been shown that frequent alterations of cell cycle regulatory genes, p16INK4a and p14ARF, are common in OVL. [13] LOH was the most frequent molecular alteration detected in the PVL lesions. Allelic loss at 9p21 was detected in at least one microsatellite marker in 63.2% of PVL patients. [13] In addition to that, transforming growth factors-alfa expression, deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy, up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 and p53 mutation have been studied in PVL. [11]


  Clinical features Top


Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia is a rare and specific disease that differs from OVL and is commonly seen in middle-aged and elderly women in the ratio of 4:1. It has been shown that almost all the lesions occur bilaterally, predominantly on the buccal mucosa followed by the palate, gingiva, and tongue. It represents a simple benign form which tends to spread and becomes diffuse. [13] Then it further progresses with different forms of presentation (homogeneous, patchy, verrucous) which in turn progress towards OSCC in over 70% of cases - with the successive appearance of multiple primary tumors

(a phenomenon known as "field cancerization") [14] [Figure 1]. PVL is usually chronic and progressive, and a patient has a long history of leukoplakia before he or she attends a clinic. [15]
Figure 1: Coexistence of lesions at various stages of evolution in the same proliferative verrucous leukoplakia case

Click here to view



  Histology Top


Histologically, the early lesions are deceptively bland, showing only hyperkeratosis, but over time they become progressively verrucous and often show varying degrees of epithelial dysplasia [Figure 2]. [8] There is an abrupt transition from hyperparakeratosis to hyperorthokeratosis, associated with a corrugated or verruciform surface. [16],[6] Hansen et al. classified the pathological process of PVL into 10 grades, that is, normal oral mucosa (0), homogeneous leukoplakia (2), verrucous hyperplasia (4), verrucous carcinoma (6), papillary squamous cell carcinoma (8), and poorly differentiated carcinoma (10), in which the odd scores refer to a status intermediate between those referred to by the adjacent even scores. [8]

Batsakis et al. reduced the number of histologic stages to four with intermediates:

  • Grade 0: Clinical flat leukoplakia without dysplasia
  • Grade 2: Verrucous hyperplasia
  • Grade 4: Verrucous carcinoma
  • Grade 6: Conventional squamous cell carcinoma with intermediates.
Figure 2: The right buccalverrucous leukoplakia with mild to moderate dysplasia (×100)

Click here to view


In early phases, it shows lymphocytic infiltrate along with pronounced lichenoid pattern characterized by basal vacuolar degeneration containing apoptotic cells and eosinophilic bodies, similar to lichen planus. [11] Therefore, PVL has no characteristic histopathological features.


  Diagnosis Top


Diagnosis of PVL is according to Hansen's first definition in 1985, not taking into account the latter ones. There are two previous studies, one by Ghazali et al. and another by Gandolfo et al., which tried to develop a set of diagnostic criteria to their respective cases, although these are just a transcription of Hansen's definition. [17]

Ghazali et al. established the following criteria

  • The lesion starts as homogenous leukoplakia without evidence of dysplasia at the first visit
  • With time, some areas of leukoplakia become verrucous
  • The disease progresses to the development of multiple isolated or confluent lesions at the same or a different site
  • With time, the disease progresses through the different histopathological stages reported by Hansen et al
  • The appearance of new lesions after treatment
  • A follow-up period of no <1-year.


Gandolfo et al., establish the following criteria

  • An initially innocuous lesion characterized by a homogenous plaque that progresses over time to an exophytic, diffuse, usually multifocal, lesion with a verrucous epithelial growth pattern
  • Histopathologically, PVL changes gradually from a simple plaque of hyperkeratosis without dysplasia to verrucous hyperplasia, verrucous carcinoma or OSCC.


Cerero-Lapiedra et al. proposed diagnostic criteria for PVL using a set of major and minor criteria

Major criteria


  • A leukoplakia lesion with more than two different oral sites, usually gingiva, alveolar ridge, and palate
  • Presence of a verrucous area
  • The lesions have spread or engrossed during the development of the disease
  • There has been a recurrence in a previously treated area
  • Histopathologically, we can find from simple epithelial hyperkeratosis to verrucous hyperplasia, verrucous carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, in situ or infiltrating.


Minor criteria

  • An oral leukoplakia lesion that occupies at least 3 cm when adding all the affected areas
  • The patient is a woman
  • The patient (male or female) does not smoke
  • Disease evolution longer than 5 years.


In order to establish the diagnosis of PVL, it was suggested that two of the following combinations have to exist: Three major criteria (E being among them) or two major criteria (E being among them) plus two minor criteria. [18]


  Malignant rate and reccurence Top


The issue that is central and which needs to be unraveled is its clandestine pathogenesis, as nearly 60-70% of PVL patients develop either a verrucous carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma in contrast to conventional oral leukoplakia where the rate of malignant transformation is much lesser. [13] PVL grows slowly. The process is irreversible and usually progresses to cancer. According to the study by Bagan et al., PVL quickly becomes malignant, on average within 4.7 years [19] whereas, Hansen et al. reported an average time to cancer of 6.1 years. However, Silverman and Gorsky reported a longer mean malignant process of 11.6 years. [13] PVL is a clinicopathologic disease with high potential for malignant transformation whose diagnosis is retrospective. According to Silverman and Gorsky (1997), [13] 70.3% of the patients studied, developed a squamous cell carcinoma at a PVL site, over a mean time of 7.7 years. Thus, PVL must be considered an aggressive lesion. [20] The appearance of mild erythematous discoloration and granular texture, which suggests epithelial erosion proved to be more effective indicators of malignancy than indurated or nodular aspects. [21] PVL shows almost 100% rate of malignant transformation, mainly over an extended follow-up period. On the other hand, it is accepted that approximately 5% of all non-PVL leukoplakias will become cancer over an average period of 5 years. [22] PVL is resistant to the available treatment modalities, such as cold knife surgery, CO 2 laser evaporation, laser surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and presents frequent recurrences. [8] The mean age of diagnosis of carcinoma associated with PVL, being slightly over 60 years, may be explained by the accumulation of somatic mutation associated with the emergence of malignancies. [13],[23] Another feature of inherited precancerous condition that may be fitting to PVL pathogenesis is that it may be caused by defects in DNA repair gene, resulting in DNA instability.


  Conclusion Top


Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia is known for its aggressive nature and tendency to recur after its removal. Thus, special awareness on the part of the clinician is extremely important. Therefore, it is recommended to have the earliest possible diagnosis, as well as consensus on diagnostic criteria to achieve uniformity. The follow-up of patients for a long time even after surgical management is of utmost importance.

 
  References Top

1.
Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009;45:309-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Van der Waal I. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa; terminology, classification and present concepts of management. Oral Oncol 2009;45:317-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson NW, van der Waal I. Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 2007;36:575-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hansen LS, Olson JA, Silverman S Jr. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia. A long-term study of thirty patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:285-98.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Gale N, Pilch BZ, Sidransky D, Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. Epithelial precursor lesions. In: Head and Neck Tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. 177.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Van der Waal I, Reichart PA. Oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia revisited. Oral Oncol 2008;44:719-21.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Torres-Pereira C, Funke V, Giovanini AF, Lemos CA Jr, Amenabar JM, Piazzetta CM. Oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) in a post-bone marrow transplant patient. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008;14:1197-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Ge L, Wu Y, Wu LY, Zhang L, Xie B, Zeng X, et al. Case report of rapidly progressive proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and a proposal for aetiology in mainland China. World J Surg Oncol 2011;9:26.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ostwald C, Rutsatz K, Schweder J, Schmidt W, Gundlach K, Barten M. Human papillomavirus 6/11, 16 and 18 in oral carcinomas and benign oral lesions. Med Microbiol Immunol 2003;192:145-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Praetorius F. HPV-associated diseases of oral mucosa. Clin Dermatol 1997;15:399-413.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Issrani R, Prabhu N, Keluskar V. Oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A case report with an update. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:258-62.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
12.
Bagan JV, Jiménez Y, Murillo J, Poveda R, Díaz JM, Gavaldá C, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma: A preliminary study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E110-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Silverman S Jr, Gorsky M. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A follow-up study of 54 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:154-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bagán JV, Murillo J, Poveda R, Gavaldá C, Jiménez Y, Scully C. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: Unusual locations of oral squamous cell carcinomas, and field cancerization as shown by the appearance of multiple OSCCs. Oral Oncol 2004;40:440-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Shopper TP, Brannon RB, Stalker WH. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: An aggressive form of oral leukoplakia. J Dent Hyg 2004;78:7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fettig A, Pogrel MA, Silverman S Jr, Bramanti TE, Da Costa M, Regezi JA. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia of the gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:723-30.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ghazali N, Bakri MM, Zain RB. Aggressive, multifocal oral verrucous leukoplakia: Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia or not? J Oral Pathol Med 2003;32:383-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cerero-Lapiedra R, Baladé-Martínez D, Moreno-López LA, Esparza-Gómez G, Bagán JV. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A proposal for diagnostic criteria. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e839-45.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bagan JV, Jimenez Y, Sanchis JM, Poveda R, Milian MA, Murillo J, et al. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: High incidence of gingival squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2003;32:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zakrzewska JM, Lopes V, Speight P, Hopper C. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: A report of ten cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:396-401.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Onofre MA, Sposto MR, Navarro CM, Motta ME, Turatti E, Almeida RT. Potentially malignant epithelial oral lesions: Discrepancies between clinical and histological diagnosis. Oral Dis 1997;3:148-52.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Schepman KP, van der Meij EH, Smeele LE, van der Waal I. Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: A follow-up study of a hospital-based population of 166 patients with oral leukoplakia from the Netherlands. Oral Oncol 1998;34:270-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kresty LA, Mallery SR, Knobloch TJ, Li J, Lloyd M, Casto BC, et al. Frequent alterations of p16INK4a and p14ARF in oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:3179-87.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Etiopathogenesis
Clinical features
Histology
Diagnosis
Malignant rate a...
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5369    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal