Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 225
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 206-210

Analysis of bone metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of a regional cancer center


1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Acharya Tulsi Regional Cancer Treatment and Research Institute, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
2 MBBS Internee, Sardar Patel Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2015

Correspondence Address:
Akhil Kapoor
Room No. 73, PG Boys Hostel, PBM Hospital Campus, Bikaner - 334 003, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.148916

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Bone metastasis is a rare occurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This retrospective study was performed to analyze the frequency and patterns of skeletal metastasis in HNSCC. Materials and Methods : We analyzed records of 8326 HNSCC patients attending our oncology outpatient department from January 2000 to December 2013. All statistical calculations were performed using MedCalc software for windows, version 12.5.0 (Osterd, Belgium). Results : Bone metastasis was found in 25 patients (0.3% of total HNSCC patients, nasopharynx excluded). 10 patients (0.66%) of carcinoma tonsil had skeletal metastasis. The patients of younger age groups had higher frequency of bone metastasis; 1.56% patients of age group 20-29 years while 0.26% patients of 60-69 years age group had skeletal metastasis (P < 0.001). However, no patient of >70 years age was found to have bone metastasis. Most common site of metastasis was spine (56%) followed by pelvis (32%). Isolated involvement of a single bony site was present in 64% of the metastatic cases. Conclusion: Bone metastasis though very rare, should be considered for evaluation in patients of HNSCC especially in younger patients.

Keywords: Bone metastasis, bone scintigraphy, head and neck squamous cell cancer


How to cite this article:
Kapoor A, Kalwar A, Narayan S, Kumar N, Singhal MK, Kumar HS. Analysis of bone metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of a regional cancer center. Clin Cancer Investig J 2015;4:206-10

How to cite this URL:
Kapoor A, Kalwar A, Narayan S, Kumar N, Singhal MK, Kumar HS. Analysis of bone metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of a regional cancer center. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 7];4:206-10. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2015/4/2/206/148916


  Introduction Top


Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. [1] In India, it accounts for one-fourth of male cancers and one-tenth of female cancers. [2] The incidence of HNSCC is about 6 times higher in India as compared to western countries probably due to oral consumption of tobacco in various forms, use of lime with betel nut and leaves and smoking.

The incidence of distant metastasis is around 14% in Indian scenario. [3] In our regional cancer center, up to 75% cases of metastasis to bones originate from the primary in breast and lung. Other primaries contributing to metastasis to bones include prostate, renal, and thyroid. The rarer primaries include the cervix, gastrointestinal tract, urinary bladder, and hematological malignancies including myeloma and lymphoma. Despite its higher incidence, HNSCC is an uncommon primary source of skeletal metastases. The lungs are the most common site of distant metastases in HNSCC. [4] With the improvement in treatment and resultant increasing duration of survival of these patients, however, increases the probability of late bone involvement. [5]

Recent data have confirmed the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as an independent risk factor for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas. [6],[7] In ASTRO 2014, a news release stated that HPV-positive SCC of the oropharynx patients experiences distant metastases after initial treatment at a later date, in more subsites and more atypical sites compared to HPV-negative patients. [8] In meeting of ASCO 2014, a press release stated that HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients may receive lower radiation dose improving outcomes and causing fewer long-term side effects. [9] In another abstract of ASCO 2014, Law et al. concluded that at median follow-up of 18-25 months, there was no difference in the overall rate of distant metastasis for HPV-positive HNSCC compared to HPV-negative/unknown (P = 0.21) but there was a significant difference in the rate of distant metastasis to the lung (P = 0.012). [10] Thus, the exact role of HPV in bone metastasis remains a subject of debate but there is consensus at present that HPV positivity confers good responsiveness of the HNSCC to chemo and radiotherapy.

For HNSCC, bone metastases traditionally have only come to the attention through pain symptoms, pathologic fractures, or abnormal laboratory test results, all of which are insensitive for early lesions. [11] Due to the low frequency of bone metastases and the high percentage of equivocal findings, bone scintigraphy (BS) is not routinely performed for staging HNSCC. [12],[13] Screening for distant metastases at sites other than the lungs is, usually, not recommended for HNSCC. [12],[14] However, BS is an important investigation to identify skeletal metastases in advanced HNSCC with suggestive symptoms. In this study, we aimed to find out the frequency of skeletal metastasis in patients of HNSCC as indicated by BS or other imaging modalities, and study its correlation with age and site of the disease.


  Materials and Methods Top


A total of 8326 HNSCC patients who attended our oncology outpatient department from January 2000 to December 2013 and whose records were available for analysis were selected for this retrospective analysis. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients were not included in this study due to the high incidence of undifferentiated carcinoma in this subgroup and thus, authors have presented similar study in NPC in a separately devoted article. [15] Scintigraphy was performed by Nucline SPIRIT DH-V variable angle dual-head camera (Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary) with technetium-99 m methylene diphosphonate. Other imaging modalities used for the diagnosis included plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT). The determination of HPV status was not done in most of the patients as it was not included in the previous protocols of the institute. The patients were stratified according to age groups and site of the primary disease. In patients with equivocal findings on imaging studies, biopsy was performed to establish bone secondaries. The patients were also screened for second primary malignancy which could have given rise to bone metastasis. The patients with established skeletal metastasis were treated with local radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions in 2 weeks) followed by chemotherapy for the systemic disease. In patients with poor general condition, 800 cGy single fraction was used to provide symptomatic relief. Frequency tables were drawn, and associations between various variables were calculated using the Chi-square test. All statistical calculations were performed using MedCalc software for windows, version 12.5.0 (Osterd, Belgium).


  Results Top


Skeletal metastasis was identified in 25 patients (0.3%) out of total 8326 HNSCC cases [Figure 1]. [Table 1] shows age wise and [Table 2] shows site wise distribution of study patients and patients with bony metastasis. The patients of younger age groups had higher frequency of bone metastasis; 1.56% patients of age group 20-29 years, 0.69% of 30-39 years, 0.18% of 40-49 years, 0.13% of 50-59 years while 0.26% patients of 60-69 years age group had skeletal metastasis (P < 0.001) [Figure 2]. However, no patient of >70 years age was found to have bone metastasis. Ten patients out of 1497 (0.66%) carcinoma tonsil cases had skeletal metastasis. Nine cases out of 3600 (0.25%) carcinoma tongue patients were found to have metastasis to bones. Besides, two each of pyriform fossa and alveolus, 1 each of larynx and lip cancer had skeletal metastasis. Most common site of bone involvement was spine (56%) followed by pelvis (32%) (P < 0.001). However, isolated involvement of spine and pelvis was 24% and 8%, respectively [Figure 3]. Overall, isolated involvement of a single bony site was present in 64% of the metastatic cases. All the patients with bony involvement were found to be suffering from locally advanced HNSCC.
Figure 1: Bar diagram showing number of positive bone scans versus site of primary disease

Click here to view
Figure 2: Bar graph showing percentage of bone metastasis versus age group (out of total 8326patients

Click here to view
Figure 3: Bar diagram showing siteof bone metastasis (overall and isolated involvement)

Click here to view
Table 1: Age wise distribution of study patients and patients with bony metastasis

Click here to view
Table 2: Site wise distribution of study patients and patients with bony metastasis

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The prime route of spread for HNSCC is lymphatic with nonlymphatic distant spread accounting for approximately 10% of the cases. [16] The lungs, bones (especially the vertebrae, ribs, and skull) and the liver are the most common sites of hematogenous distant metastases from HNSCC. [16],[17] In a study by Gowen and Desuto-Nagy, 6.2% of the patients were diagnosed of having distant metastasis during the follow-up period after the initial treatment. [17] The most common sites of distant metastasis were the lungs (58%) and the bones (22%). Similarly, Holsinger et al., from the Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, provided a panel of clinical and histopathological predictors that can identify patients at the greatest risk for development of distant metastases in HNSCC. [18] In their study, the 5-year incidence of distant metastasis was 15.1% (94/622). Pulmonary metastases were most commonly found: 65.9% to the lung, 4.2% to the mediastinum, 2.1% to the pleura. Metastases to bone (22.3%) and to the liver (9.5%) were the next most commonly encountered. 31.9% patients with distant metastases presented with more than one metastatic site. The most common site for bony metastasis was the spine (12.7%), followed by skull (4.2%), rib (3.1%), and axial bones (femur, humerus; each 2.1%). In our study also, spine was the most common site followed by pelvic bones and ribs. A possible reason for preferential axial involvement could be the greater vascularity of the red marrow in the axial skeleton as opposed to the yellow marrow in the appendicular bones. More than half of patients with osseous metastases presented with multiple sites. Many of the patients complained of bone pain, which may be due to multiple mechanisms including release of chemical mediators, elevated intra-osseous pressure and elevation of periosteum. Fractures and impending fractures are also an important source of pain, especially in weight-bearing bones. Such fractures are more common in areas involved with lytic metastases rather than blastic ones. Trilling et al. could identify only 19 patients of HNSCC reported to have spinal metastasis from 1965 to 2009 with thoracic vertebra being the most common site (17/19, 89.47%) exemplifying the ill reporting of the issue. [19]

In our study, mainly primaries located in tonsil and tongue showed metastasis to bones. These were also the most common sites of HNSCC registered in our hospital. Overall, 0.3% HNSCC patients had skeletal metastases in this study. In a study by Bhandari and Jain, out of 624 patients of head and neck cancers, 6 (0.96%) developed metastasis to solitary or multiple bones during the course of the disease. [20] In a study by Li et al., it was found that primary tumor site, level of tumor invasion and also numbers of levels with positive lymph node are closely related to the occurrence of distant metastasis in HNSCC. [21] Lesions arising in the larynx and hypopharynx have a greater predilection to metastasize than oral lesions, although true vocal cord lesions infrequently metastasize as demonstrated by Snow et al. [22] In data of Merino, 8% of all patients who had local control developed metastases, while 23% of those with T3 to T4 lesions had local control and developed distant spread. [23] The time interval between the diagnosis of distant metastasis and death is <2 years in >90% of such cases.

Another important observation in this study is the prevalence of the higher metastasis in younger age; 1.56% in 20-29 years and 0.69% in 30-39 years age group. All other groups had bone metastasis in <0.3%. This could point toward the most aggressive nature of the disease in younger patients.

Because distant metastasis has an important impact on survival, early detection of this unfavorable status in HNSCC is substantial for therapeutic strategy regulation. [23] As the lungs, bones and the liver are the most common sites of distant metastases from HNSCC, routine examination about these organs should be performed for high-risk patients. The prevalence of metastases at autopsy (37-57%) is much higher than in clinical studies (4-26%). [24] This suggests that distant metastases in head and neck cancer are often asymptomatic. In the absence of useful screening tests, metastases are, usually, detected by specific investigation of suspicious symptoms. Plain X-rays, CT and BS are the most frequently used investigations. Since the introduction of technetium-based scan agents, approximately 30 years ago, the radioisotope bone scan has been the standard method for detection of bony metastases. Radioisotope scanning is more sensitive than radiography for detection of most metastases. [25] Tracer accumulates in the reactive new bone that is formed in response to the lesion. Thus, most metastatic lesions are "hot;" however, "cold" lesions due to a complete absence of reactive bone may be encountered in aggressive metastases. Furthermore, the amount of accumulation is directly proportional to the level of blood flow. Diffuse accumulation of tracer throughout the skeleton due to disseminated skeletal disease (known as super scan) may lead to the false impression of a normal scan. Despite the sophisticated mechanism, the BS suffers from a lack of specificity. [26] Tracer accumulation may occur in any skeletal location with an elevated rate of bone turnover and thus, may accompany trauma, infection or arthropathy. The probability that an abnormal scan represents metastatic tumor is directly linked to the number of abnormal foci. In a patient with foci of increased uptake and a known primary tumor, the scan strongly suggests metastases. A small number (<4) of abnormalities is more likely to represent metastatic disease in some locations than others, with rib lesions being particularly low-yield. [27] Only 50% of solitary foci represent metastases, even among patients with cancer. This lack of specificity is well-known and has led to recommendations that positive scans be accompanied by radiographic correlation. However, given the greater sensitivity of the bone scan, a positive radiograph may confirm a finding, but a negative radiograph does not exclude a metastasis.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) is another widely used investigation to evaluate patients with HNSCC. PET/CT can provide early and accurate detection of bone metastases from HNSCC. Use of FDG-PET/CT in restaging HNSCC allows for detection of occult lung, live and bone metastases, and this early detection frequently influences therapeutic decision making. In a study by Basu et al., the identification of bone metastases by PET/CT influenced therapeutic decisions in 5 of 13 cases (38%). [25] Some studies have also compared PET with BS. Fujimoto et al. reported that diagnostic accuracy of bone metastasis was comparable in PET and BS. [26] BS is cheaper and more readily available. Furthermore, PET may miss solitary bone metastasis in the skull bone and lower limbs as field of visualization in PET is, usually, from face to upper thigh. However, BS may miss purely osteolytic bony metastases.

Knowledge of the natural history of various cancers and the factors that contribute to distant metastases as well as good judgment are essential for cost-effective treatment planning and decision making with regard to both pre- and post-operative evaluation for distant metastases in cancer of the head and neck. Distant bone metastases are infrequent despite the increasing overall survival of patients with these carcinomas, but should be considered in any patient with a concurrent or past diagnosis of HNSCC. The very short time from discovery of bone dissemination to death in most of these patients should be considered when contemplating operative intervention or radical radiotherapy. As metastasis to osseous tissue is the second most common presentation of distant metastases in HNSCC, BS is an important and sensitive test. It may be particularly helpful in younger age groups.


  Conclusions Top


The frequency of bone metastasis in HNSCC in our patient cohort was 0.3%. Though very rare, it should be considered for evaluation in patients of HNSCC especially in younger patients. This needs to be confirmed by well-designed prospective trials.


  Acknowledgments Top


The authors would like to thank consultants in Department of Oncology, Dr. A. Sharma, Dr. Neeti Sharma, Dr. S. L. Jakhar, and Dr. M. R. Baradia. Furthermore, they express gratitude to PG Students of the Department: Dr. Satyanarayan, Dr. Murali, Dr. Tanya, Dr. Rajesh, and Dr. Ramesh Purohit.

 
  References Top

1.
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yeole BB. Trends in incidence of head and neck cancers in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007;8:607-12.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Alavi S, Namazie A, Sercarz JA, Wang MB, Blackwell KE. Distant lymphatic metastasis from head and neck cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:860-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Al-Othman MO, Morris CG, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall WM. Distant metastases after definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2003;25:629-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pietropaoli MP, Damron TA, Vermont AI. Bone metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Surg Oncol 2000;75:136-41.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dayyani F, Etzel CJ, Liu M, Ho CH, Lippman SM, Tsao AS. Meta-analysis of the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on cancer risk and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Head Neck Oncol 2010;2:15.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gillison ML, D′Souza G, Westra W, Sugar E, Xiao W, Begum S, et al. Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:407-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
ASTRO News Release. Available from: https://www.astro.org/News-and-Media/News-Releases/2014/Trosman-H-N-release.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Oct 03].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
ASCO Press Release. Available from: http://www.article.wn.com/view/2014/06/19/HPVpositive_head_and_neck_cancer_patients_may_receive_lower_/. [Last accessed on 2014 Oct 03].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Law JY, Chen SA, Gerber DE, Hughes RS, Madrigales A, Myers LL, et al. Patterns of distant metastases in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:5s. [Suppl; Abstract 6071].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Preciado DA, Sebring LA, Adams GL. Treatment of patients with spinal metastases from head and neck neoplasms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:539-43.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
de Bree R, Deurloo EE, Snow GB, Leemans CR. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 2000;110:397-401.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Brown DH, Leakos M. The value of a routine bone scan in a metastatic survey. J Otolaryngol 1998;27:187-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Silver CE, Rinaldo A, Mondin V. Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001;63:202-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kapoor A, Kalwar A, Kumar N, Maharia S, Nirban RK, Kumar HS. Detection of bone metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by bone scintigraphy: A retrospective study in perspective of limited resource settings. Clin Cancer Invest J 2015;4. in press.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Marioni G, Blandamura S, Calgaro N, Ferraro SM, Stramare R, Staffieri A, et al. Distant muscular (gluteus maximus muscle) metastasis from laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:678-82.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gowen GF, Desuto-Nagy G. The incidence and sites of distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963;116:603-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Holsinger FC, Myers JN, Roberts DB, Byers RM. Clinicopathologic predictors of distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Abstracts from 5 th International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, San Francisco; 2000. [Abstract 120].  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Trilling GM, Cho H, Ugas MA, Saeed S, Katunda A, Jerjes W, et al. Spinal metastasis in head and neck cancer. Head Neck Oncol 2012;4:36.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bhandari V, Jain RK. A retrospective study of incidence of bone metastasis in head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2013;9:90-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Li X, Di B, Shang Y, Zhou Y, Cheng J, He Z. Clinicopathologic risk factors for distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:1348-53.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Snow JB Jr, Gelber RD, Kramer S, Davis LW, Marcial VA, Lowry LD. Randomized preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for patients with carcinoma of the head and neck: Preliminary report. Laryngoscope 1980;90:930-45.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Merino OR, Lindberg RD, Fletcher GH. An analysis of distant metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer 1977;40:145-51.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
León X, Quer M, Orús C, del Prado Venegas M, López M. Distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients who achieved loco-regional control. Head Neck 2000;22:680-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Basu D, Siegel BA, McDonald DJ, Nussenbaum B. Detection of occult bone metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Impact of positron emission tomography computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:801-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Fujimoto R, Higashi T, Nakamoto Y, Hara T, Lyshchik A, Ishizu K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases detection in cancer patients: Comparison between bone scintigraphy and whole-body FDG-PET. Ann Nucl Med 2006;20:399-408.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Jacobson AF, Stomper PC, Jochelson MS, Ascoli DM, Henderson IC, Kaplan WD. Association between number and sites of new bone scan abnormalities and presence of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 1990;31:387-92.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Bone metastases from head and neck malignancies: Prognostic factors and skeletal-related events
Salvatore Grisanti,Susanna Bianchi,Laura D. Locati,Luca Triggiani,Stefania Vecchio,Alberto Bonetta,Cristiana Bergamini,Pierfranco Conte,Mario Airoldi,Marco Merlano,Paolo Carlini,Toni Ibrahim,Ciro Rossetto,Salvatore Alfieri,Paolo Pronzato,Sandro Tonoli,Roberto Maroldi,Piero Nicolai,Carlo Resteghini,Stefano M. Magrini,Alfredo Berruti,Jonathan H. Sherman
PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(3): e0213934
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5025    
    Printed67    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal