Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 359
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9-12

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Comprehensive analysis of 11 cases


1 Department of Urology, KLES Kidney Foudation, Belgaum, India
2 Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication9-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Shridhar C Ghagane
Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.149023

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a subtype of RCC. chRCC is diagnosed mainly in sixth decade of life. An incidence of chRCC is similar in both men and woman. Eighty-six percent of chRCCs cases are diagnosed in early stages. To analyze the clinical behavior of chRCC, we retrospectively evaluated the data from our hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, clinical presentation, prognosis, and clinical outcome of chRCC in a retrospective series of nephrectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively looked at our hospital database, which included 318 patients who had undergone surgery for RCC between January 2000 and December 2013. Several parameters were noted in each patient, which included age, sex, symptoms at presentation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor diameter, tumor node metastasis stage and grade, histologic cell type, follow-up time, local recurrence, disease progression, and death. Results: Of 318 patients included in the database, 11 (3.45%) had chRCC. Preoperatively, 9 (81%) had T1 lesions, and the remaining 2 (18.9%) had T2 lesions. Of the T1 lesions, 6 had tumors ≤4 cm (T1a) in diameter and the remaining 3 had tumors >4 cm (T1b) in diameter. The mean survival of the patients was 99.27 ΁ 27 months. Conclusions: Our series confirms a favorable outcome for the chRCC subtype with little local aggressiveness and a low propensity for progression and death from cancer.

Keywords: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma


How to cite this article:
Nerli RB, Pattanshetti S, Ghagane SC, Malur P R. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Comprehensive analysis of 11 cases. Clin Cancer Investig J 2015;4:9-12

How to cite this URL:
Nerli RB, Pattanshetti S, Ghagane SC, Malur P R. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Comprehensive analysis of 11 cases. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 14];4:9-12. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2015/4/1/9/149023


  Introduction Top


Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accounts for 2-3% of all adult malignant neoplasms and is the most lethal of all common urological cancers. [1] RCC is primarily a disease of the elderly patient, with the typical presentation in the sixth and seventh decades of life. [2],[3] The majority of cases of RCC are believed to be sporadic and only 2% to 3% are familial. [4] All RCCs are, by definition, adenocarcinomas, derived from renal tubular epithelial cells. [1],[2] Most RCCs share ultra-structural features, such as surface microvilli and complex intracellular junctions, with normal proximal tubular cells, and are believed to be derived from this region of the nephron. [1]

The 2004 World Health Organization classification of RCC recognized several subtypes of RCC. Most common subtypes are: Clear cell RCC (70%), papillary RCC (10-15%), chromophobe RCC (chRCC) (4-6%), collecting duct carcinoma (about 1%) and unclassified RCC (4-5%). [5],[6] chRCC was first described by the ones and colleagues in 1985 [1] and were a distinctive histologic subtype of RCC that appears to be derived from the cortical portion of the collecting duct. [1],[7] The tumor cells typically exhibit a relatively transparent cytoplasm with a fine reticular pattern that has been described as a "plant cell" appearance. A perinuclear clearing or "halo" is typically found, and electron microscopic findings consist of numerous 150-300 nm microvesicles, which are the single most distinctive and defining feature of chromophobe cell carcinoma. [8],[9] These microvesicles characteristically stain positive for Hale colloidal iron, indicating the presence of a muco-polysaccharide unique to chRCC. [10] Most chRCCs also stain positive for various cytokeratins and most are negative for vimentin. [11] Genetic analysis has revealed multiple chromosomal losses, most frequently the whole chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21, and flow cytometric analysis has demonstrated hypodiploid DNA content in most cases. [12],[13]

We retrospectively reviewed our series of patients with RCC and in particular chRCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, clinical presentation, prognosis, and clinical outcome of chRCC in a retrospective series of nephrectomy specimens. Our study does not involve comparison of chRCC with other variants as there is not much data present.


  Materials and methods Top


We retrospectively looked at our hospital database which included 318 patients who had undergone surgery for RCC between January 2000 and December 2013. The clinical charts were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and those requiring hemodialysis were not included in this study. The pathologic stage and grade were assigned in accordance with the latest tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging. [1],[2],[6] Tumor size was determined from the pathologic specimens as the greatest diameter in centimeters. The Heidelberg classification was used to stratify the histologic subtypes. [1],[2],[5],[6] The general health status was measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score. For statistical analysis, patients were stratified by an ECOG performance status of 0 versus 1 or more.

Several parameters were noted in each patient, which includes age, sex, symptoms at presentation, ECOG performance status, tumor diameter, TNM stage and grade, histologic cell type, follow-up time, local recurrence, disease progression, and death. At the most recent follow-up visit, the vital status was evaluated and described as alive (no evidence of disease or disease progression), deceased (by disease, of any other cause with or without evidence of disease, and by any treatment complication).

The patient presentation was categorized as incidental or symptomatic. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography scan of the kidney ureter and bladder region and chest X-ray. During the follow-up period, the patients underwent a physical examination, routine laboratory evaluation, and imaging studies every 6 months for the 1 st year and yearly thereafter. Data from patients lost to follow-up were actualized by contacting relatives. The survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and were calculated using the date of surgery to the date of death or last follow-up.


  Results Top


Of 318 patients included in the database, 11 (3.45%) had chRCC 4 (36.36%) were men and 7 (63.63%) women. The mean patient age was 59.36 ± 6.65 years (range: 54-76). The tumor was located in the right kidney in six patients (54.5%) and in the left kidney in 5 (45.5%), no familial or bilateral disease was observed. None of the tumors showed multifocality.

Of the 11 patients, 8 (72.7%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis, 3 (27.3%) presented with local symptoms related to a renal mass (hematuria, pain), and 2 (18.18%) complained preoperatively of systemic symptoms (fever, generalized weakness). The asymptomatic tumors were detected by abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography. At the time of presentation, all patients had ECOG performance status of 0. Preoperatively 9 (81%) had T1 lesions, and the remaining 2 (18.9%) had T2 lesions. Of the T1 lesions, 6 had tumors ≤4 cm (T1a) in diameter and the remaining 3 had tumors >4 cm (T1b) in diameter. All patients [6] with incidentally diagnosed T1a lesions underwent partial nephrectomy whereas the remaining five underwent radical nephrectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed the chromophobe variety of RCC. The microscopic features were classical. Resected lymph nodes did not show evidence of metastasis in any of the patients. Surgical margins were clear. None of the patients had any major intra/postoperative complications.

The mean follow-up of the patients is months. During this period, none of the patients had local recurrence of the disease, whereas the two patients (18%) with T2 disease developed distant metastases, one in the chest and the other in bony pelvis and left femur. Both these patients died 12-15 months following diagnosis of the metastases. Both the patients did not receive any further treatment for metastasis as the patients/attenders could not afford treatment with sumitinit/sucfinit/pazopanile. One other patient who neither had local recurrence or distant metastases died due to noncancer cause [Figure 1]. The mean survival of the patients was 99.27 ± 27 months. All the eight patients surviving to date (December 2013) have ECOG performance status of 0.
Figure 1: The graph showing the survival probability of patients alive and death

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Renal cell carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease, comprised of different histological variants with distinct clinical course, genetic changes and response to systemic treatment. chRCC comprise 5% of all the cases of RCC. The mean age of occurrence is in the fifth decade, with a range of 27-86 years, more commonly observed in women (52%) than in men (48%). [14] chRCC are usually located in the renal cortex. Presence of cystic areas as well as multifocality (10% to 12%) is usually rare. [14] Most of the cases present early and are diagnosed to have either stage I or II lesions. Renal vein invasion is seen in 5% of cases and incidence of metastatic disease is 6-7%. The most common sites of metastases are liver (39%) and lung (36%). [14]

Macroscopically, chRCC are well-circumscribed highly lobulated solid neoplasms. Microscopic features are [Figure 2]a and b that of a solid tumor, at times tubulocystic, with broad fibrotic septa. In general two different types of tumor cells are present in varying proportions. The first type includes pale polygonal cells with abundant transparent cytoplasm and prominent cell membranes. [14],[15] These cells are admixed with a second population of smaller cells with granular and eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei of both appear irregular. Binucleation and perinuclear halos are commonly seen. [14],[16] There are different variants of chRCC according to the proportion of cells. The eosinophilic variant (>80% eosinophilic cells) shares certain characteristics with oncocytomas (nested, alveolar or sheet like architecture with eosinophilic granularity, perinuclear clearing and peripheral accentuation of cytoplasm). This type is often bilateral (11%) and multifocal (22%). The classic type (>80% pale cells) is associated with necrosis and sarcomatoid changes (aggressive tumors with a high potential for distant metastases). Mixed chRCC have variable architecture. [17]
Figure 2: (a) H and E, ×10 image-shows mixture of classic (chromophobic) and eosinophilic cells, with distinct cytoplasmic borders, perinuclear halos, and nuclear "raisins." (b) ×40 chromophobe renal cell carcinoma stains positive for Hale colloidal iron and demonstrate multiple microvesicles

Click here to view


Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by a familial tendency to develop multiple cutaneous fibrofolliculomas and trichodiscomas of the hair follicle. [1],[18] Several studies have reported a predisposition for these families to develop multifocal or bilateral renal cancer, particularly chRCC. [1],[18],[19],[20]

Cindolo et al. [21] retrospectively analyzed the clinical behavior of chRCC, from a database of 3228 patients who underwent surgery between 1986 and 2002 in six European centers. Of the 3228 patients, 104 (3.2%) affected by chRCC were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.6 years (range: 22-83). Of the 104 patients, 51 (49%) were men, and 53 (51%) were women. The mean tumor size was 6.4 ± 3.6 cm. An incidental diagnosis accounted for 61.5% of the cases. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 88 patients (85%). After a median follow-up of 38 months (mean 44, range: 1-153), no local recurrence was observed. The 5 years overall survival rate for chRCC was 81%. Of the 104 patients, 5 (4.8%) and 9 (8.6%) died of unrelated causes and renal cancer, respectively. However, the authors did not find any incidence of familial or inherited tumor.

Przybycin et al. [22] studied 203 consecutive primary chRCCs resected at their institution. Over median follow-up of 6.1 years (range: 0.1-18 years), 5 years and 10 years disease specific events occurred in 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5%, 7.4%) and 6.4% (95% CI: 2.7%, 12.2%) patients. Outcomes showed a significant association with tumor size, small vessel invasion, sarcomatoid features and microscopic necrosis (P ≤ 0.05 each). On the basis of their long-term follow-up the authors concluded that chromophobes seemed to have better clinical outcomes than those reported for clear cell and papillary RCCs.

In 1995, Akhtar et al.[23] reported that 19% of the chRCCs were incidentally diagnosed. By contrast, Peyromaure et al.[24] recently described 68.8% rate of incidental chRCC. In our series, 64% of the patients had no symptoms related to a kidney tumor at diagnosis. This finding could be explained by the large proportion of patients with low-stage tumors and the widespread use of noninvasive imaging techniques. In our series to the incidence of incidentally diagnosed chRCC was %. Several recent reports have confirmed good prognosis as well as survival rates in patients with chRCC. Cheville et al.[6] and Beck et al.[25] showed that the 5 years cancer-free survival rate was 86.7% and the disease-free survival rate was 80.1%. Cindolo et al. [21] reported a 3 years and 5 years overall survival rate for chRCC of 94% and 81%, respectively (mean follow-up 44.2 months). Compared with other variants of RCC, chRCC showed a better prognosis (at last follow-up, 91.3% of the patients were alive without evidence of disease) with very low rates of progression and cancer-related death. The cancer-related death rate was 22%, 16%, and 8.6% for clear, papillary, and chRCC in their series with the same follow-up. This was because more than 70% of patients had organ-confined disease (stage T2 or less) and more than 60% of tumors were well or moderately differentiated. Moch et al. [26] and Cheville et al. [6] considered the percentage of histologic tumor necrosis also of prognostic value.

In our series too patients with chRCC presented with low-grade and low-stage disease and there was disease progression seen in only 18%. None of the patients exhibited bilateral disease, nor any patients had metastatic disease at presentation.


  Conclusions Top


Our study confirms a general favorable outcome for chRCCs, which are predominantly low-stage and low-grade tumors. These tumors had little local aggressiveness, as well as a low propensity for progression and death from cancer. Metastasis at diagnosis and disease progression after nephrectomy is rare. A radical surgical approach remains the reference standard therapy, but nephron-sparing techniques are also associated with good outcome, especially for those patients with a well-documented resectable mass.

 
  References Top

1.
Campbell SC, Lane BR. Malignant renal tumors. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10 th ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunders; 2012. p. 1413-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS. The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:1611-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wallen EM, Pruthi RS, Joyce GF, Wise M. Urologic diseases in America project. Kidney cancer. J Urol 2007;177:2006-18.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2006;176:2353-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:612-24.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Störkel S, Steart PV, Drenckhahn D, Thoenes W. The human chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: Its probable relation to intercalated cells of the collecting duct. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1989;56:237-45.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nagashima Y, Okudela K, Osawa A, Nakamura N, Kawasaki C, Moriyama M, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid change. A case report. Pathol Res Pract 2000;196:647-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Krishnan B, Truong LD. Renal epithelial neoplasms: The diagnostic implications of electron microscopic study in 55 cases. Hum Pathol 2002;33:68-79.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Thoenes W, Störkel S, Rumpelt HJ, Moll R, Baum HP, Werner S. Chromophobe cell renal carcinoma and its variants - A report on 32 cases. J Pathol 1988;155:277-87.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cochand-Priollet B, Molinié V, Bougaran J, Bouvier R, Dauge-Geffroy MC, Deslignières S, et al. Renal chromophobe cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A comparative morphologic, histochemical, and immunohistochemical study of 124 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:1081-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Iqbal MA, Akhtar M, Ulmer C, Al-Dayel F, Paterson MC. FISH analysis in chromophobe renal-cell carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:3-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Polascik TJ, Bostwick DG, Cairns P. Molecular genetics and histopathologic features of adult distal nephron tumors. Urology 2002;60:941-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vera-Badillo FE, Conde E, Duran I. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A review of an uncommon entity. Int J Urol 2012;19:894-900.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Prasad SR, Humphrey PA, Catena JR, Narra VR, Srigley JR, Cortez AD, et al. Common and uncommon histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: Imaging spectrum with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2006;26:1795-806.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Stec R, Grala B, Maczewski M, Bodnar L, Szczylik C. Chromophobe renal cell cancer - Review of the literature and potential methods of treating metastatic disease. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009;28:134.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Amin MB, Paner GP, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Young AN, Stricker HJ, Lyles RH, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1822-34.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Toro JR, Glenn G, Duray P, Darling T, Weirich G, Zbar B, et al. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: A novel marker of kidney neoplasia. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1195-202.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cohen PR, Kurzrock R. Miscellaneous genodermatoses: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome, hereditary tylosis, incontinentia pigmenti, and supernumerary nipples. Dermatol Clin 1995;13:211-29.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Dal Cin P. Genetics in renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2003;13:463-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Cindolo L, de la Taille A, Schips L, Zigeuner RE, Ficarra V, Tostain J, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Comprehensive analysis of 104 cases from multicenter European database. Urology 2005;65:681-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Przybycin CG, Cronin AM, Darvishian F, Gopalan A, Al-Ahmadie HA, Fine SW, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study of 203 tumors in 200 patients with primary resection at a single institution. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:962-70.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Akhtar M, Kardar H, Linjawi T, McClintock J, Ali MA. Chromophobe cell carcinoma of the kidney. A clinicopathologic study of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:1245-56.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Peyromaure M, Misrai V, Thiounn N, Vieillefond A, Zerbib M, Flam TA, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of 61 cases. Cancer 2004;100:1406-10.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
25. Beck SD, Patel MI, Snyder ME, Kattan MW, Motzer RJ, Reuter VE, et al. Effect of papillary and chromophobe cell type on disease-free survival after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma . Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:71-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: A Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 2000;89:604-14.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5266    
    Printed59    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded77    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal