Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 523
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 34-38

A clinicopathological study of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with review of the literature


1 Department of Pathology, St. John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, St. John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication9-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
B N Nandeesh
Department of Pathology, St. John's Medical College, Bengaluru - 560 034, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.149035

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare, aggressive neoplasm of the central nervous system occurring mainly in the early childhood. Objective: The objective of the present study was to study the clinicopathologic features of this newly recognized tumor. Materials and Methods: A retrospective search of pathology files from a series of brain tumors revealed five patients with features of AT/RT. The clinical, radiological and pathological features were analysed. Results: The cases included three boys and two girls with age ranging from 2 years to 15 years. The tumors were located in the infratentorial (three located in the cerebellar hemispheres) and supratentorial areas (two located in the parietal and frontal lobes). One of the cerebellar tumors involved bilateral cerebellopontine (CP) angles, mimicking a primary CP angle tumor (like neurofibroma) with two small deposits in the cerebrum (parietal lobe). Radiologically all the five cases had heterogeneous enhancement with two of them exhibiting cystic change within. Histopathologically, the tumors were composed of rhabdoid cells, undifferentiated small cells, mixed with epithelial, mesenchymal, and neural tumor-like areas. The proportion of each of these elements varied in all the four cases. One of the tumor had predominantly small cells with focal rhabdoid differentiation mimicking a medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Conclusion: AT/RT is an aggressive tumor with a varied clinical and pathological profile. The present case series helps in creating an awareness of this complex tumor and stresses the importance of correct diagnosis of this neoplasm that tends to have a bad prognosis.

Keywords: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, central nervous system neoplasm, pediatric brain tumor, rhabdoid tumor


How to cite this article:
Rout P, Nandeesh B N, Chabra MS, Chand AK. A clinicopathological study of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with review of the literature. Clin Cancer Investig J 2015;4:34-8

How to cite this URL:
Rout P, Nandeesh B N, Chabra MS, Chand AK. A clinicopathological study of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with review of the literature. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 17];4:34-8. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2015/4/1/34/149035


  Introduction Top


Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare, highly aggressive, central nervous system (CNS) malignancy that usually affects very young children. The age at presentation is, usually, <2 years. [1],[2] However, it has also been reported to occur in older children and adults. [1] This tumor is typically misdiagnosed as medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) primarily because 70% of AT/RTs contain fields indistinguishable from classic PNETs. Separation of these two tumor types is crucial because the prognosis for AT/RT is grim even when treatment includes surgery with or without radio- and/or chemotherapy. [2] Disseminated forms occur in 20-30% of cases. Patients with ATRT typically follow a dismal course, and the median time to death is only a few months after the diagnosis. The neoplasm has characteristic histologic and genetic features which would differentiate from these mimics. However, the clinical and imaging characteristics could be variable and nonspecific. The histological hallmark of AT/RT is the presence of rhabdoid cells; these cells have brightly eosinophilic cytoplasm, large and eccentrically placed nuclei, and a single prominent nucleolus each, with or without fibrillary globoid inclusions. [3] The present case series describes the clinical, pathological, and imaging features observed in this particular neoplastic entity.


  Materials and methods Top


A retrospective search of pathology files at our institution from 2005 to 2012 revealed five patients with brain tumors exhibiting embryonal/blastemal tumor morphology and rhabdoid features. The records and the slides were retrieved for a detailed clinical, radiological and pathological analysis. The paraffin blocks were subjected to immunohistochemical staining using Ki-67, INI1, synaptophysin, cytokeratin, and GFAP. The histopathological details were studied by two pathologists independently, and results analyzed.


  Results Top


The study included five cases that satisfied the features of AT/RT. Three of the patients were males, and two of them were girls. The mean age of these patients was 9.1 years with age ranging from 2 years to 15 years. The main presenting symptoms in these patients were those related to raised intracranial tension/hydrocephalus. The other symptoms included seizures, headache, vomiting and visual changes. One of the cases also presented with extremity weakness, lethargy, extraocular muscle weakness, facial paralysis and decreased gag reflex. There were no neurocutaneous markers observed in any of these tumors. The tumors were located in infratentorial and supratentorial areas. Two of the cases were supratentorial with one in the frontal and the other located in the parietal lobe, while the remaining three infratentorial cases were situated in the cerebellar hemispheres. One of these cerebellar tumors involved bilateral cerebellopontine (CP) angles [Figure 1]a, mimicking a primary CP angle tumor with two small deposits in the cerebrum (parietal lobe) [Figure 1]c. The clinical differential diagnoses in these patients were mainly medulloblastoma/PNET, exophytic brainstem glioma and neurofibromatosis 2 Wishart type in the case with bilateral CP angle involvement. All patients underwent surgical excision of the tumor, with gross total resection achieved in only two patients. These patients were referred to a higher oncocenter for chemotherapy. Three of them expired within 1 year and two patients, particularly the adolescent ones have survived for more than 1½ years postdiagnosis. Radiologically all the cases had heterogeneous enhancement with two of them exhibiting cystic change within.
Figure 1: (a) Magnetic resonance image (MRI) showing a heterointense mass involving bilateral cerebellopontine angles (arrows). (b) MRI showing a cerebellar cystic lesion with a mural nodule. (c) MRI showing two cerebral nodules (asterix*) with a larger mass in the cerebellum (primary)

Click here to view


The average size of these lesions was 3.5 cm in its greatest dimension. All tumors showed marked heterogeneity on both computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance images (MRIs). One of them showed foci of calcifications. Three of the tumors showed both cystic and solid areas [Figure 1]b. The cystic areas were usually eccentric. The walls of the eccentric cysts showed varying degrees of enhancement. The solid component of the masses was heterogeneous and showed varying degrees of increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images, decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images. The solid portion in two of the cases also showed evidence of necrosis. Preoperatively these neoplasms appeared greyish yellow, vascular, friable and exhibited a poor plane with the normal structures. Microscopically, the cerebellar folia/cerebrum was seen infiltrated by the tumor. The tumor consisted of solid sheets of malignant cells with a mixture of small, embryonal type cells and large cells with abundant cytoplasm [Figure 2]e. The small cells had indistinct outlines, sparse cytoplasm, and dense nuclei. These cells, at some of the foci, were arranged in a nested pattern within a delicate fibrovascular stroma (vague nodularity) giving a trabecular or alveolar/organoid/glandular pattern of appearance. These cells constituted the teratoid component of the tumor [Figure 2]a-d. One of the cases had a predominant small cell component almost forming the entire volume of the tumor. The large cells had eccentric vesicular pleomorphic nuclei with a prominent nucleolus. The cytoplasm appeared homogeneous bright pink with an inclusion like appearance. These cells comprised the rhabdoid component of the neoplasm [Figure 2]e. One of the cases had a predominant rhabdoid component [Figure 2]f. Aberrant mitotic activity was observed with necrosis. There were cytokeratin positive cells in the teratoid areas [Figure 2]g. INI1 done on these tumors showed absent nuclear staining in three of them, cytoplasmic staining in one and patchy nuclear staining in the other [Figure 2]h and i.
Figure 2: (a) Microphotograph showing a small round cell tumor infiltrating the cerebellum (H and E, ×40). (b) Microphotograph showing small cells arranged in a nested pattern (H and E, ×100). (c) Microphotograph showing small cells forming glandular structures/spaces (H and E, ×100). (d) Microphotograph showing small cells forming small glandular structures and nests (H and E, ×200). (e) Microphotograph showing a mixture of small embryonal and large rhabdoid cells (H and E, ×400). (f) Microphotograph showing predominantly rhabdoid cells (H and E, ×400). (g) Microphotograph showing cytokeratin positive staining of the tumor cells. (h) Microphotograph showing cytoplasmic staining of the INI1. (i) Microphotograph showing absence of nuclear staining of INI1

Click here to view


Glial fibrillary acidic protein highlighted the normal brain parenchyma infiltrated by the tumor. All the tumors satisfied the diagnosis of AT/RT (WHO grade IV).


  Discussion Top


Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor is a rare and highly malignant tumor of the CNS that tends to occur in infancy and early childhood. [1] A CNS tumor of rhabdoid cells was first described in 1985, but its clinical and pathological features were not well defined until 1995-1996. Rorke et al., first characterized this tumor as "AT/RT," based on the disparate combination of rhabdoid, primitive neuroepithelial, epithelial, and mesenchymal components. [2]

It is believed that AT/RT accounts for approximately 1-3% of pediatric brain tumors with a slight male predominance (male to female ratio of 1.6:1). [3],[4] The present series had a 3:2 male to female ratio. This neoplasm is extremely rare in adulthood. The age at presentation is, usually, <2 years, however, some older children and even adults with AT/RT have been described. [5],[6],[7]] Two of the patients in the present series were adolescents (11 and 15 years) suggesting that the occurrence in older childhood and adolescence may not be very uncommon. In view of a very small sample size (cases), the mean age may not be reliable. This differs from medulloblastoma, which has a peak occurrence at 7 years of age. [8] Koral et al. described that the mean age of presentation of ATRT was lower than that of medulloblastoma, that is, 1.32 years versus 6.52 years. [9]

The majority of these tumors (approximately two-third) occur in the posterior fossa, especially cerebellar hemisphere. [4],[10],[11] Other areas reported to be affected include the cerebral hemispheres, suprasellar, pineal region and the spine. [10],[12] Three out of the five cases in the present study had the neoplasm located in the posterior fossa with one of them involving bilateral CP angle. This CP angle involvement is not uncommon as compared to medulloblastoma and is observed in about 15% of the patients. [2]

The clinical symptoms, signs and the radiological appearance of AT/RT appear to be similar to those of PNET- medulloblastoma, which frequently misleads AT/RT to a preoperative diagnosis of PNET/medulloblastoma. [4] In medulloblastoma of childhood, the tumor usually arises from the vermian area and grows into the fourth ventricle, but AT/RT may arise from the cerebellar hemisphere and grow into the adjacent cisternal space instead of filling the fourth ventricle. Compression and displacement of the fourth ventricle by mass effect of the tumor is very unusual in medulloblastoma as compared to AT/RT. Also radiologically, AT/RT tends to be relatively more heterogeneous on CT and MRI with an inhomogeneous enhancement. Calcification, cyst formation, and hemorrhage are frequently associated. [13] The other clinical differential point is the patient's age. Medulloblastoma is rare in infants and the median age for diagnosis is about 6 years. [2] Cerebellar hemispheric location and aggressive growth pattern could be considered as gross morphologic characteristics of this tumor. [4]

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors are histologically-mixed tumors that contain a "rhabdoid" element plus a variable amount of PNET-like areas. The medulloblastoma/PNET resembling areas contain small, primitive looking neuronal cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and anaplasia. [2] Importantly, the tumor is characterized by the presence of a distinct cell type which is called the rhabdoid cell. Recognition of the rhabdoid element by the pathologist is critical because this is the characteristic feature of AT/RT and the presence of rhabdoid cell phenotype correlates with a significantly worse prognosis than the classic PNET/medulloblastoma histology. [2],[14],[15] The rhabdoid cells have been described as medium to large cells with eccentrically placed vesicular (i.e. lightly staining chromatin) nucleus, prominent nucleolus and a brightly eosinophilic cytoplasm (which contains whorled cytoplasmic intermediate filaments). [16] The rhabdoid cells of ATRTs are always immunopositive for vimentin, which is highlighted in the cytoplasmic filamentous inclusions. The large majority of tumors (95%) are also positive for EMA, and 75% are positive for smooth muscle actin. Variable immunopositivity is seen for a variety of other markers including epithelial markers (cytokeratins) and neuroectodermal markers, for example, GFAP. [8]

In addition, some AT/RTs may have mesenchymal and epithelial components. Because of this morphologic variability, AT/RTs have been often misclassified. [5],[6],[12],[17],[18] The rhabdoid component was present in all the four cases in the present series, except one, where the rhabdoid cells were focal and was picked up only on thorough sampling. It is not surprising that such AT/RTs in the posterior fossa with a very sparse rhabdoid component may be misdiagnosed as medulloblastoma during frozen section, intraoperatively or when the tissue is not adequately sampled. This distinction will be a real difficult in a small or nonrepresentative biopsy featuring only the small cell component. In such instances, the application of a panel of immunohistochemical stains would be needed.

A mutation or deletion in the INI1/hSNF5 gene occurs in the majority of AT/RT tumors. Absence of nuclear expression of INI1 is a critical tool for accurate AT/RT diagnosis and antibody to INI1 can be used to confirm. [19] However, INI1 staining maybe absent in many high-grade brain tumors. [20] The INI1 was unstained in three of our cases, but however one case showed cytoplasmic staining and the other with incompletely retained nuclear staining, a similar observation in some reports. [21] This can be explained by the fact that a wide spectrum of mutation has been found spanning the entire length of the INI1 protein. Some of these mutations can lead to nuclear export of the INI1 protein leading to a cytoplasmic localization of the protein or a missense mutation leading on to a nonfunctional expression of the protein in the nucleus (retained nuclear staining). [22],[23] This mutation may have to be confirmed by a cytogenetic workup. As far as histogenesis is concerned, there is a great deal of controversy. Many proposals highlight the histiocytic, mesenchymal, meningeal, neuroectodermal or even germ cell lineage of AT/RT. [3],[24]

The optimal treatment for AT/RT remains unclear. Until date, the role of surgery for AT/RT has not been well defined. While surgery is effective in reducing the mass, children who receive surgery without adjuvant therapy can die within a month. [25] The role of the extent of surgery in different locations is also unclear. To achieve gross total resection, some authors have recommended aggressive surgical excision, including second surgery where feasible. [26] Chemotherapy also has a part to play in treatment of this tumor, especially in children younger than 3 years of age, in whom radiation therapy needs to be delayed due to its deleterious effect on the developing CNS. They are refractory to PNET and germ cell chemotherapy. Older children with ATRT tend to have better outcomes than that of their younger counterparts. Apart from malignant local invasion, up to one-third of patients have CSF dissemination at the time of diagnosis. [8] One of the case, in the present series, had deposits in the cerebral hemisphere and disseminated forms have been reported to occur in 20-30% of cases. [1],[26]

Patients with ATRT typically follow a dismal course and the median time to death is only a few months after the diagnosis. [3],[26],[27],[28] This is especially true for children below 3 years of age. Moreover, children of this age group are more likely to have dissemination at diagnosis and have a faster rate of progression. [26] The death rate from the disease is 84%, despite aggressive therapy including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. [29] On the contrary, the 5-year survival rates for PNET/medulloblastoma have achieved 90% or greater with advances in neurosurgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. [14]


  Conclusion Top


The lack of therapeutic response and a dismal prognosis requires that AT/RT be distinguished from tumors of the PNET/medulloblastoma group. Cellular neoplasms (particularly small cell tumors) arising in the cerebellum of infants and children naturally suggest the differential diagnosis of medulloblastoma. Indeed, this was the initial diagnosis in three of our cases in the present series. This series also highlights the varied clinicopathological and radiological spectrum of AT/RT which has to be considered in the differential diagnosis of posterior cranial fossa pediatric tumors to avoid misdiagnosis and erroneous prognostication. The important radiological cues to be considered are heterogeneous mass lesions with calcifications, eccentric cysts, invasive pattern of tumor growth and off midline location in the posterior fossa particularly in children younger than 2 years.


  Acknowledgment Top


The authors would like to acknowledge the faculty and postgraduate students of Department of Pathology for technical assistance.

 
  References Top

1.
Chan KH, Mohammed Haspani MS, Tan YC, Kassim F. A case report of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour in a 9-year-old girl. Malays J Med Sci 2011;18:82-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rorke LB, Packer RJ, Biegel JA. Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood: Definition of an entity. J Neurosurg 1996;85:56-65.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Judkins AR, Eberhart CG, Wesseling P. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2007. p. 147-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lee YK, Choi CG, Lee JH. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the cerebellum: Report of two infantile cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:481-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chung YN, Wang KC, Shin SH, Kim N, Chi JG, Min KS, et al. Primary intracranial atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor in a child: A case report. J Korean Med Sci 2002;17:723-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kleihues P, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Rorke LB, Reifenberger G, Burger PC, et al. The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002;61:215-25.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Raisanen J, Hatanpaa KJ, Mickey BE, White CL 3 rd . Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: Cytology and differential diagnosis in adults. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:60-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Vogel H, Fuller GN. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors, embryonal tumors, and other small cell and poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003;7:387-98.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Koral K, Gargan L, Bowers DC, Gimi B, Timmons CF, Weprin B, et al. Imaging characteristics of atypical teratoid-rhabdoid tumor in children compared with medulloblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:809-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hilden JM, Watterson J, Longee DC, Moertel CL, Dunn ME, Kurtzberg J, et al. Central nervous system atypical teratoid tumor/rhabdoid tumor: Response to intensive therapy and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 1998;40:265-75.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Oka H, Scheithauer BW. Clinicopathological characteristics of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1999;39:510-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Tinsa F, Jallouli M, Douira W, Boubaker A, Kchir N, Hassine DB, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the spine in a 4-year-old girl. J Child Neurol 2008;23:1439-42.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Arslanoglu A, Aygun N, Tekhtani D, Aronson L, Cohen K, Burger PC, et al. Imaging findings of CNS atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:476-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rahmat K, Kua CH, Ramli N. A child with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour of the posterior cranial fossa. Singapore Med J 2008;49:e365-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Parwani AV, Stelow EB, Pambuccian SE, Burger PC, Ali SZ. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the brain: Cytopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis. Cancer 2005;105:65-70.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yachnis AT. Neuropathology of pediatric brain tumors. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997;4:282-91.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Burger PC, Yu IT, Tihan T, Friedman HS, Strother DR, Kepner JL, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system: A highly malignant tumor of infancy and childhood frequently mistaken for medulloblastoma: A Pediatric Oncology Group study. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:1083-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Dang T, Vassilyadi M, Michaud J, Jimenez C, Ventureyra EC. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:244-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Biegel JA, Tan L, Zhang F, Wainwright L, Russo P, Rorke LB. Alterations of the hSNF5/INI1 gene in central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and renal and extrarenal rhabdoid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3461-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Edgar MA, Rosenblum MK. The differential diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A critical examination of some recent immunohistochemical applications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:500-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Makuria AT, Rushing EJ, McGrail KM, Hartmann DP, Azumi N, Ozdemirli M. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) in adults: Review of four cases. J Neurooncol 2008;88:321-30.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Craig E, Zhang ZK, Davies KP, Kalpana GV. A masked NES in INI1/hSNF5 mediates hCRM1-dependent nuclear export: Implications for tumorigenesis. EMBO J 2002;21:31-42.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kalpana GV, Marmon S, Wang W, Crabtree GR, Goff SP. Binding and stimulation of HIV-1 integrase by a human homolog of yeast transcription factor SNF5. Science 1994;266:2002-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rorke LB, Biegel JA. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour. In: Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, editors. Pathology and Genetics Tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. p. 123-48.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Bansal KK, Goel D. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of central nervous system. J Paediatr Neurosci 2007;2:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hilden JM, Meerbaum S, Burger P, Finlay J, Janss A, Scheithauer BW, et al. Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: Results of therapy in children enrolled in a registry. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2877-84.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lee IH, Yoo SY, Kim JH, Eo H, Kim OH, Kim IO, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of the central nervous system: Imaging and clinical findings in 16 children. Clin Radiol 2009;64:256-64.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Zimmerman MA, Goumnerova LC, Proctor M, Scott RM, Marcus K, Pomeroy SL, et al. Continuous remission of newly diagnosed and relapsed central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor. J Neurooncol 2005;72:77-84.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Zuccoli G, Izzi G, Bacchini E, Tondelli MT, Ferrozzi F, Bellomi M. Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour of infancy. CT and MR findings. Clin Imaging 1999;23:356-60.  Back to cited text no. 29
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgment
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2172    
    Printed50    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded42    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal