Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 565
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 561-563

Colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A diagnostic dilemma on cytology


Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication11-Oct-2014

Correspondence Address:
Shailja Puri Wahal
Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla - 171 001, Himachal Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.142698

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is mesenchymal tumors arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal (pace maker cells) of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Stomach is the most common site (60-65%) of these tumors. Large intestine and rectum constitute only 5-10% of GIT tumors. Pre-operative diagnosis helps in the management of this tumor as it responds well to c-kit inhibitors. The cytological diagnosis of GIST is characteristic, however, associated with many pitfalls leading to erroneous diagnosis. Morphological resemblance is seen with other spindle cell and epithelioid cell tumors. The differentiation between high grade and low grade GISTs is described but not reliable. Cytology combined with cell block and Immunocytochemistry helps in making a confident diagnosis. Here we present colonic GIST diagnosed as GIST on cytology and confirmed on histopathology. We report this case to describe the cytological features of GIST and pitfalls in the cytology.

Keywords: Colon, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, interstitial cells of Cajal


How to cite this article:
Wahal SP, Sharma R, Gupta N, Gulati A. Colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A diagnostic dilemma on cytology. Clin Cancer Investig J 2014;3:561-3

How to cite this URL:
Wahal SP, Sharma R, Gupta N, Gulati A. Colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A diagnostic dilemma on cytology. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Oct 13];3:561-3. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2014/3/6/561/142698


  Introduction Top


Gastrointestinal stromal tumors constitute 0.1-3% of gastrointestinal tumors (GITs). [1] GISTs are mesenchymal tumors having a submucosal location. Stomach is the most common site for GIST followed by the small intestine (20-25%), colon and rectum (5%), and esophagus (<5%). [2] GISTs express c-kit proto-oncogene, are immune-reactive for CD-117 and they respond to c-kit inhibitors. [3] Pre-operative diagnosis on cytology is helpful in the management of the GIST. Cytological examination helps in the pre-operative diagnosis. However, there are various pitfalls in diagnosis of GIST on cytology. Close resembles with smooth muscle tumors, nerve sheath tumors, granulation tissue, epithelial tumors, and inability to predict the long term behavior of tumors are some of the pitfalls. Cytology combined with cell block preparation and Immunocytochemistry are helpful in making a confident diagnosis pre-operatively.


  Case report Top


A 55-year-old male patient presented with pain in right lumbar region and altered bowel habits for 2 months. General physical examination was within normal limits. On abdominal examination, an ill-defined firm mass was detected in right hypochondrium. Ultrasonography revealed a soft-tissue mass involving the ascending colon. Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed from the colonic mass.

Cytological smears revealed pleomorphic cells lying singly. Individual cells revealed high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, eccentrically placed nuclei, irregular nuclear membrane, hyperchromatic to granular chromatin, and 1-2 conspicuous nucleoli [Figure 1]a. The cytoplasm was abundant, had irregular cell borders, fine vacuolated, and showed cytoplasmic protrusions [Figure 1]b. On the basis of cyto-morphological features, a diagnosis of malignant mesenchymal tumor - colonic mass was given. A right hemicolectomy was performed. Grossly, an ulcerated growth was seen on the mucosal surface. Microscopic examination revealed spindle shaped tumor cells forming short fascicles in the submucosa [Figure 1]c. The growth extended up to the serosa. Areas of necrosis were seen. The mitotic count was 5 mitotic figures/50 high power field (hpf). Immunohistochemistry was performed for desmin, S-100, CD-34 and CD-117. The tumor cells were reactive for CD-117 (cytoplasmic and nuclear) [Figure 1]d and CD-34. Based on the histopathologic features and immunohistochemistry, a diagnosis of malignant GIST- ascending colon was given.
Figure 1: (a) Cytological smears were cellular showing pleomorphic cells with high N/C ratio, eccentric nuclei, hyperchromatic to granular chromatin, and conspicuous nucleoli (Giemsa, ×10). (b) The cytoplasm was abundant, had irregular cell borders, fine vacuolated, and showed cytoplasmic protrusions (Giemsa, ×40). (c) The tumor cells extending from submucosa to serosa, spindle shaped (inset) cells forming short fascicles having eosinophilic cytoplasm, vesicular nucleus and prominent nucleolus (H and E, ×10 and × 40). (d) The spindle cells are immunoreactive for CD-117

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Gastrointestinal stromal tumors accounts for only 0.1-3% of all GI neoplasms, but, simultaneously, they are the most frequent mesenchymal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs are frankly malignant in 10-30% of cases and cause mortality in 2% of cases. [2] Invasion of adjacent structures or metastases may be present. Metastasis to the ascitic and pleural fluid are also on record. Clinically, most patients present with an abdominal mass, pain and melena. GISTs are believed to arise from interstitial cells of Cajal. These cells express CD-117 (c-kit) antigens. CD-117 is sensitive (79-86%) and relatively specific for GIST. Criteria to predict their tumor behavior include size, necrosis, and mitotic rate as suggested by Miettinen and Lasota [4] . A mitotic count above 5/50 hpf and size above 2 cm is associated with an increased rate of progressive disease and increased risk of metastasis. Primary omental or mesenteric localizations are rare; in such cases the correct term is extra-GIST. [2] GIST has no preference for gender; its peak incidence is between 40 and 70 year, with a broad age distribution. [5] These tumors do not usually involve the mucosa, but commonly originate in the wall of the GIT tract. [6] They represent a morphologically diverse group of neoplasms that display features of smooth muscle and neural differentiation. Each cell possesses a single elongated nucleus with squared-off ends. Their eosinophilic cytoplasm, at times with a perinuclear vacuole, shows no evidence of specific differentiation. Less often, tumors may be composed completely of polygonal neoplastic cells with better defined borders and centrally positioned ovoid nuclei called epithelioid GIST. A single tumor may show both spindled and epithelioid cells.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors represent a distinct clinicopathologic entity that is characterized by genetic mutations in the c-kit proto-oncogene. [7] Before introduction of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided FNA biopsy, most of the GISTs were diagnosed by either endoscopic biopsy or surgical resection due to their submucosal or intramural location. Recent studies have shown that EUS combined with FNA cytology appears to be of great value in the evaluation of intramural lesions of the GIT tract, especially GISTs. [8] In practice c-kit inhibitors have become available for the treatment of GISTs, hence the pre-operative diagnosis of these tumors has gained importance.

The cytomorphological features shows only few to moderate numbers of neoplastic cells. They may be dispersed as isolated elements or present as small to large clumps. These clumps may be associated with extracellular matrix material. Each cell is spindle to ovoid in shape, has high N/C ratio. The cells contain single ovoid nucleus with blunt ends. The staining intensity of chromatin is variable. It is usually granular with even distribution. The nucleoli are inconspicuous, cytoplasm is cyanophilic and the cell borders are indistinct. Leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) are very close differential of GIST on cytology. Leiomyoma which is a very common tumor of the GIT is characterized by variable cellularity and are composed of bland spindle cells with abundant cytoplasm often having fibrillary appearance [9] . No atypia, mitosis or epithelioid cells are identified. Wieczorek et al.[10] compared the cytology of GIST with that of LMS. The LMS showed three-dimensional, tightly cohesive, sharply marginated syncytia of spindle cells, often with nuclear crush artifact. The cytoplasm/stroma had a distinct wiry, retractile appearance. LMSs more commonly exhibited pleomorphism. Epithelioid cytomorphology, mitoses, and necrosis occasionally were observed in both tumor types. Immunocytochemistry was helpful to differentiate between these two entities. About 100% GIST showed immunostaining with CD-117 and all LMS were immunoreactive for smooth muscle actin.

Other differentials on cytological smears are benign and malignant nerve sheath tumors. These tumors show fibrillar cytoplasm and "wavy" nuclei characteristic of nerve sheath tumors. Metastatic GISTs with epithelioid morphology may cause significant diagnostic difficulty with carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, melanoma or even hepatocellular carcinoma. [11] The cytological features of melanoma are loose aggregates or isolated cells, cellular pleomorphism, enlarged nuclei with nucleoli, bi-nucleation, multi-nucleation, intra-cytoplasmic melanin. Hepatocellular carcinomas show neoplastic cells forming trabeculae and endothelial cells lining the groups. Intra-nuclear inclusions and no bile pigment are important distinguishing features. The distinction of metastatic GIST from other metastatic tumors is important as the former responds well to c-kit inhibitors.

Furthermore, the question of benign versus malignant may be impossible to answer. Vij et al.[12] studied the subtle differences between low grade, malignant and metastatic GIST on cytology. Malignant and metastatic GIST was more cellular than the benign GIST. Epithelioid morphology was more commonly seen in malignant and metastatic GIST. The nucleoli were indistinct in low grade GIST and prominent or multiple in high grade GIST irrespective of the cell type. Malignant GIST showed the presence of nuclear inclusions. Ascitic and pleural fluid cytology smears showed the presence of loosely formed aggregates with epithelioid morphology. It was concluded from the study that mitosis was the key morphologic feature that suggested high grade malignant GIST. However, it was difficult to find mitosis in cytological smears since the tumor cells occurred in closely packed

cohesive thick tissue fragments. In their study Li et al.[13] they found that mitoses found in resected specimens were seldom found on cytological smears. Very little pleomorphism was found in cytological smears of malignant GIST. Dirty or necrotic background was also not a reliable criterion for differentiating low grade and high grade GIST.

Tamiolakis et al.[14] used cell block preparation and immunohistochemistry along with cytological smears for more confident diagnosis. The cell blocks had basophilic appearance and were cellular. Pleomorphism was mild to moderate, mitosis varied from 1 to 10/50 high power field. Nucleoli were indistinct and cytoplasm showed vacuoles. Immunostaining with CD-117 was positive in 100% cell block preparation.


  Conclusion Top


Gastrointestinal stromal tumor show a broad morphologic variety, but nuclear pleomorphism by cytology alone, rarely correlates with malignant potential. We were not able to diagnose the mesenchymal tumor as GIST due to unavailability of Immunocytochemistry and lack of material for cell block preparation. An excellent response to c-kit inhibitors warrants pre-operative diagnosis. However, in the appropriate clinical and radiological setting, a confident diagnosis of GISTs can be documented by FNA cytology, cell block and immunocytochemical studies.

 
  References Top

1.
Zappacosta R, Caraceni D, Stura S, Zappacosta B, Rosini S. Thin-Layer cytopathology of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in effusion: Diagnostic Dilemmas. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2009;39:367-71.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sakurai S, Fukasawa T, Chong JM, Tanaka A, Fukayama M. Embryonic form of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMemb/MHC-B) in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 1999;154:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Streutker CJ, Huizinga JD, Driman DK, Riddell RH: Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease. Part I: Normal ICC structure and function with associated motility disorders. Histopathology 2007;50:176-89.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastointestinal stromal tumors. Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol 2006;23:70-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Scarpa M, Bertin M, Ruffolo C, Polese L, D′Amico DF, Angriman I. A systematic review on the clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:384-92.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J. Gastointestinal stromal tumors: Recent advances in understanding of their biology. Hum Pathol 1999;30:1213-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Willmore-Payne C, Layfield LJ, Holden JA. C-kit mutation analysis for diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in fine needle aspiration specimens. Cancer 2005;105:165-70.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Elliott DD, Fanning CV, Caraway NP. The utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical analysis with emphasis on malignant tumors. Cancer 2006;108:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dong Q, McKee G, Pitman M, Geisinger K, Tambouret R. Epithelioid variant of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2003:29:55-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wieczorek TJ, Faquin WC, Rubin BP, Cibas ES. Cytologic Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with emphasis on the differential diagnosis with leiomyosarcoma. Cancer Cytopathology 2001;93:276-87.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Vander Noot MR 3 rd , Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum I, Jhala D, Jhala N, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2004;102;157-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Vij M, Aggarwal V, Kumar A, Pandey R. Cytomorphology of gastrointestinal stromal and extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive morphologic study. Journal of Cytology 2013;30:8-12.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Li SQ, O′Leary TJ, Buchner SB, Przygodzi RM, Sobin LH, Erosan YS, et al. Fine needle aspiration of gastrointestinal tract stromal tumors. Acta Cytol 2001;45:9-17.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tamiolakis DJ, Venizelos ID, Cheva AD, Lambropoulou MC, Nikolaidou SA, Jivannakis TE, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors utilizing scanning electron microscopy. Medicina (Kaunas) 2005;41:117-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1714    
    Printed31    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal