Submit Your Article CMED MEACR meeting
Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 855
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 217-221

Patterns of nucleolar organizer region in urinary bladder cancer in view of 2004 WHO classification of urothelial neoplasms


1 Department Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital and V.M.M. College, New Delhi, India
2 Department Pathology, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
4 Department Pathology, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication21-Jan-2013

Correspondence Address:
Yogesh K Yadav
145, A-Block, South City, Rae Barelly Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226 025
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.106267

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: The last decade has seen a tremendous upheaval since introduction of WHO-1998 classification (modified in 2004) of bladder carcinoma, which only recently seems to have settled down. We compare both old (WHO-1973) and new (2004) classifications with argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) score. Aims: To compare WHO/ISUP (World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists) consensus classification-2004 and WHO-1973 classification of bladder carcinoma and to establish correlation between AgNOR scores and various grades of carcinoma bladder. Materials and Methods: Sixty H and E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) stained sections of transitional cell carcinoma bladder were graded according to WHO/ISUP (2004) and WHO (1973) classification systems and the results were compared. This was then followed by AgNOR staining of the paraffin-embedded sections and subsequent AgNOR scores were calculated and given as total score, extranucleolar score, intranucleolar score, and nucleolar score. These were correlated with the grade of the tumor. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA test. Results: It was observed that the two grading systems, WHO/ISUP (2004) and WHO (1973) correlated with each other. Also it was observed that the total AgNOR score and extranucleolar AgNOR score increased with the grade of the tumor and thus increasing scores carry significance in assessment of the grade of the tumor. However, intranucleolar and nucleolar scores showed variable degree of overlap in various grades of the bladder tumors. Conclusions: WHO/ISUP (2004) classification correlated well with the WHO (1973) classification. The total AgNOR score was found to be helpful in assessment of the grade of the tumor but the distribution of the AgNOR carried little significance.

Keywords: Argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region score, urothelial neoplasms, 2004 WHO classification


How to cite this article:
Soin P, Yadav YK, Valiathan M, Mallya V. Patterns of nucleolar organizer region in urinary bladder cancer in view of 2004 WHO classification of urothelial neoplasms. Clin Cancer Investig J 2012;1:217-21

How to cite this URL:
Soin P, Yadav YK, Valiathan M, Mallya V. Patterns of nucleolar organizer region in urinary bladder cancer in view of 2004 WHO classification of urothelial neoplasms. Clin Cancer Investig J [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Oct 23];1:217-21. Available from: http://www.ccij-online.org/text.asp?2012/1/4/217/106267


  Introduction Top


Attempts toward earliest classification of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) bladder started as early as 1940s, when Ash proposed the first accepted classification of bladder carcinoma. [1] Since then various classification systems have been proposed, most commonly used being WHO (World Health Organization) -1973 classification and WHO/ISUP (World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists)-1998 classification. The latter was essentially reproduced as the 2004 WHO classification scheme. [2] The WHO (1973) classification includes grade I, II, and III, whereas the WHO/ISUP (2004) classification includes papilloma, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP), low-grade lesion and high-grade lesion. PUNLMP, a new entity was introduced to bridge the gap between papilloma and low-grade lesion. This is important owing to increased risk of developing a more aggressive malignant lesion. [2],[3],[4]

Further, one of the important proliferation markers, which can be used to assess the tumor aggressiveness, is AgNOR (argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region) score. Nucleolar organizer regions (NOR) have loops of DNA transcribed into rRNA located at each of short arm of the acrocentric chromosome 13, 14, 15, 21, and 22. [5] Various studies have shown that there is an increase in AgNOR score with increase in the grade of the tumor owing to increased transcriptional activity. AgNOR score studies on bladder neoplasms have indicated statistical separation between normal and neoplastic urothelium. Moreover, malignant lesions have polymorphic AgNOR dots and tendency toward clumping. [6] However, these studies have been limited by some degree of overlap in various grades of the bladder tumors. [6],[7]

The aim of the article was to compare WHO/ISUP (2004) classification of bladder carcinomas with WHO (1973) classification and to establish correlation between AgNOR scores and various grades of bladder carcinomas.


  Materials and Methods Top


Sixty cases of TCC bladder diagnosed during January 2005 to February 2010 were included in the study. These cases were obtained from transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Biopsies were processed routinely with paraffin embedding, followed by H and E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) and AgNOR staining. AgNOR staining was done by the following method. [8]

Solutions used for AgNOR staining were:

  1. 50% silver nitrate solution (silver nitrate 50 g and distilled water 100 ml)
  2. Gelatin solution (gelatin 2 g, formic acid 1 ml and distilled water 100 ml)
Working solution was prepared using 2 parts of silver nitrate solution and 1 part of gelatin solution. The solutions were mixed just before use.

Method used for staining was as below:

  • Dewax sections in xylene
  • Hydrate through alcohols to water
  • Rinse sections in distilled water
  • Incubate in freshly prepared working solution for 45 min at room temperature
  • Wash in distilled water for 1 minute
  • Dehydrate clear and mount in DPX
Grading of the carcinoma was done according to the WHO/ISUP (2004) and WHO (1973) classification. The presence of invasion of lamina propria, muscularis propria, vascular and perineural invasion, squamous metaplasia was also noted. AgNOR scoring was done under oil immersion (100 × objective) on hundred malignant cells, which were then interpreted as extranucleolar, intranucleolar, nucleolar scores. [9] Then a total score of a particular nucleus was obtained by adding these scores. The mean of hundred malignant nuclei was then calculated to obtain AgNOR score of a particular case. The results of the two grading systems were then statistically compared (Chi square test). Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) test was used for assessment of difference in AgNOR scoring. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


  Results Top


The cases belonged to a broad age group ranging from 36 to 85 years with a peak in the age range of 61 to 70 years. The mean age of males was 61.5 years while of females it was 65.3 years. Male to Female ratio was 5:1. Hematuria was seen in 80.2% of cases, whereas obstructive symptoms were seen in 70.4% cases. About 40.8% of the cases were smokers. Other significant etiological factors included history of vesical calculus in 3.3% cases, history of chemical exposure in 9.4% cases (workers in dye industry), and history of radiation therapy for carcinoma cervix in 6.9% cases.

Grading of the carcinoma was done using WHO/ISUP (2004) and WHO (1973) classification [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The results of which were compared using the chi square test [Table 3]. Invasion of muscularis propria [Figure 1]a was seen in 75% cases of the high-grade lesions. About 10% of cases showed foci of squamous metaplasia. One case showed foci of both vascular and perineural invasion [Figure 1]b and c. AgNOR scores were then counted in tumors histologically diagnosed as PUNLMP [Figure 2], low-grade lesions [Figure 3],and high-grade lesions [Figure 1]d and [Figure 4]. Differences in the scores were assessed using the ANOVA test [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8].
Table 1: Grading of the cases of transitional cell carcinoma bladder according to WHO/ISUP classification (2004)


Click here to view
Table 2: Grading of the cases of transitional cell carcinoma bladder according to WHO classification (1973)


Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of WHO/ISUP (2004) with WHO (1973) classification


Click here to view
Table 4: Mean scores (nucleolar) and standard deviation in various grades of transitional cell carcinoma


Click here to view
Table 5: Mean scores (extranucleolar) and standard deviation in various grades of transitional cell carcinoma


Click here to view
Table 6: Mean scores (intranucleolar) and standard deviation in various grades of transitional cell carcinoma


Click here to view
Table 7: Mean scores (total) and standard deviation in various grades of transitional cell carcinoma


Click here to view
Table 8: P values of AgNOR scores


Click here to view
Figure 1: High-grade lesion showing perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and invasion of muscularis propria, (a), (b) and (c) , respectively, (H and E, ×400). Also showing typical AgNOR stain (×400) for these high grade lesions (d)

Click here to view
Figure 2: PUNLMP (a) (H and E, ×100) and (b) AgNOR stain (×400)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Low-grade lesion (a) (H and E, ×400) and (b) AgNOR stain (×400)

Click here to view
Figure 4: High-grade lesion (a) (H and E, ×400) and (b) AgNOR stain (×400) (×400)

Click here to view


The mean and the extranucleolar AgNOR scores increased with the grade of the lesion, whereas the nucleolar and intranucleolar scores showed variable results with increasing grade of the lesion thus concluding that the overall AgNOR scores correlated with the grade of the tumor but the pattern of staining of AgNOR dots does not correlate with the increasing grade of the tumor in bladder carcinoma.


  Discussion Top


TCC accounts for most common malignancies of the urinary bladder. [10] Peak incidence of TCC is seen in sixth decade. McCarthy et al. [11] found that only 0.8% of these are present under the age of 30 years. Cases in this study belonged to a wide age range (39 to 85 years) with a peak age incidence around 61 to 70 years.

They found that it is more commonly seen in males than females with approximate male to female ratio of 3 to 4:1, [10] where as in this study, we found that male to female ratio as 5:1.

Among the etiological factors, smokers have shown 4.02 times more risk of developing carcinoma bladder than non-smokers. [11] The number of smokers were 40.8% of the cases in this study. Smoking increases the AgNORs in the oral cavity. It has been demonstrated that larger number of AgNOR proteins are present in exfoliative cytology specimens obtained from the mucosa of the lateral tongue border of smokers who presented with no clinically visible alterations when compared to nonsmokers. [12] The average number of AgNORs/nucleus is related to the number of cigarettes per day in the mouth floor of smokers. These results suggest a possible relation between the number of cigarettes per day and an increase rate of cellular proliferation in the oral mucosal cells. [13],[14]

Rehn demonstrated increased risk of bladder tumors in dye workers, most commonly associated carcinogen being aryl amine and nitro compounds. [10] We, in this study, found that occupational exposure to such chemicals were seen in 9.4% of cases. Sternberg et al. [10] associated vesical calculi leading to carcinoma owing to prolonged irritation of bladder mucosa. The role of ionizing radiation has also been considered as one of the etiological factors. [15] In the previous studies, hematuria and obstructive symptoms were the most common complaints in the cases of bladder carcinoma. [1],[10],[11] In this study, we also found similar results with 80.2% cases presenting with hematuria and 70.4% cases presenting with obstructive symptoms.

Various classifications have been used to grade carcinoma bladder amidst which WHO (1973) and WHO/ISUP (2004) are commonly used. [4],[16] WHO (1973) includes Papilloma, grade I, II, and III under the classification thus limited by the drawback of labeling a low-grade lesion as carcinoma. [3] Papilloma is defined as a small usually solitary papillary lesion with a delicate fibro vascular core, which is lined by cytologically and architecturally normal urothelium without mitosis. However, the incidence of papilloma is rare. [3] We did not encounter any case of papilloma.

WHO/ISUP (2004) classification included Papilloma, PUNLMP, low grade and high-grade carcinoma. [2] PUNLMP, a new entity introduced with orderly arrangement of cells with papillae showing minimal atypia irrespective of its thickness. Incidence of PUNLMP reported is 12%. The present study had 26.6% cases of PUNLMP. [3] According to Cheng et al., 56% of the cases were of low grade while 32% of the cases were of high grade TCC. [17] The present study brought up 48.3% of low-grade lesions and 25.0% of high-grade lesions of TCC.

A comparison, which was done on the two classification systems, brought into consideration the fact that all cases of PUNLMP correlated with WHO grade I, which also included three low-grade tumors of the new classification. Invasion of lamina propria was seen in 75% of high grade tumors, whereas invasion of muscularis propria was seen in 62.5% of high grade cases however, one case of high grade tumor showed foci of vascular and perineural invasion. Invasion of muscularis propria is found to be associated with bad prognosis and risk of recurrence. [18] Vascular invasion has also been found to be associated with risk of recurrence. [11] Squamous metaplasia was seen in 26.6% of high grade tumors and 6.9% of low grade tumors. According to Silverberg et al., metaplasias are most commonly seen in high grade tumors. [1]

Several studies have been done using AgNOR staining on various lesions, which include lymphomas, cutaneous melanocytic lesions, and esophageal carcinomas. [8],[19],[20] The present study was done using AgNOR staining on various grades of TCC bladder. Criteria used to assess satisfactory staining of AgNOR are minimal non-specific background precipitate, fine uniformly stained AgNOR dots, and discernible AgNOR dots lying within a clustered nucleolar structure. [8]

In general, it has been observed that high-grade tumors have AgNOR dots, which are more numerous and are smaller. [21] AgNOR staining is related to cell cycle and is associated with cell proliferation. [21] The present study indicated that as the grade of the tumor increased, there was an increase in total AgNOR score along with increase in extranucleolar AgNOR score. However, some degree of overlap was seen in PUNLMP-low grade and low grade-high grade lesions. Also nucleolar and intranucleolar pattern of AgNOR dots had a variable staining pattern. According to Cairns et al., [6] some degree of overlap was seen in AgNOR staining in different grades of urothelial tumors. Another study by Tomobe et al. [22] also showed an increase in AgNOR score with an increase in grade of tumor. However, the study by Paul Mansor et al. [23] showed no correlation between these two parameters. Korneyer attributed the overlap seen in AgNOR staining pattern of grade II and grade III to slight difference in proliferation state between two grades of the tumor and to some extent to subjectivity of grading as the qualitative method with considerable intraobserver and interobserver variations. [6] According to Crocker et al. [21] intraobserver and interobserver variations seen in AgNOR counts ranged from 2% to 7%. This has been found to be associated with two factors; first being the tumor heterogenicity associated with variable number of histiocytes seen throughout the tumor and secondly is the section thickness. It is necessary for the section to be adequately thick to include all NOR profiles, simultaneously it should be appropriately thin so that the NOR profiles can be separated easily, thus aiding in AgNOR counts. [21]

Thus, to summarize, the two grading systems for TCC bladder, WHO/ISUP (2004) and WHO (1973), when compared, correlated well and were found to be statistically significant. Further significant correlation of the grade of the tumor was seen with the mean and extranucleolar AgNOR scores. However, some overlap was seen in between PUNLMP-low grade and low grade-high grade lesions. Also, the grade of the tumor did not correlate with intranucleolar and nucleolar AgNOR scores which showed a significant degree of overlap, thus concluding that the AgNOR scores correlated with the grade of TCC but the various staining patterns of AgNOR did not correlate with the grade of the tumor.

 
  References Top

1.Ash JE. Epithelial tumors of the bladder. J Urol 1940;44:135-45.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Grignon DJ. The current classification of urothelial neoplasms. Mod Pathol 2009;22:860-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Cheng L, Bostwick DG. World Health Organization and International Society of Urological Pathology classification and two-number grading system of bladder tumours. Cancer 2000;88:1513-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:1435-48.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Yekeler H, Erel O, Yumbul AZ, Doymaz MZ, Dogan O, Ozercant MR, et al. A sensitive staining method for NORs. J Pathol 1995;175:449-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Cairns P, Suarez V, Newman J, Crocker J. Nucleolar organizer regions in transitional cell tumors of the bladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:1250-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Korneyer A, Mamaev NN, Kozlov VV, Rybakova MG, al-Shukri SH. Interphase AgNOR and nucleolar counts in transitional cell carcinoma bladder tumors. Mol Pathol 2000;53:129-32.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Bancroft JD. Cytoplasmic granules, organelles and neuroendocrine. In: Bancroft JD, Marilyn G editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 350-1.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Evans AT, Orrell JM, Grant A. Re-evaluating silver stained nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORS) in problematic cutaneous melanocytic lesions: A study with quantitation and pattern analysis. J Pathol 1991;165:61-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Reuter VE. Theurothelial tract: Renal pelvis, ureter, urinary bladder and the urethra. In: Mills SE editor. Sternberg's diagnostic surgical pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 2035-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Culver HA, Feldstein AL, Taylor TH. Occupation and bladder cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:89-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Fontes PC, Corrêa GH, Issa JS, Brandao AA, Almeida JD. Comparison of exfoliative pap stain and agnor counts of the tongue in smokers and nonsmokers. Head Neck Pathol 2008;2:157-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Cançado RP, Yurgel LS, Filho MS. Comparative analyses between the smoking habit frequency and the nucleolar organizer region associated proteins in exfoliative cytology of smokers' normal buccal mucosa. Tob Induc Dis 2004;2:43-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Sampaio Hde C, Loyola AM, Gomez RS, Mesquita RA. AgNOR count in exfoliative cytology of normal buccal mucosa. Effect of smoking. Acta Cytol 1999;43:117-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Lucien E, Nochomoritz. The renal pelvis, ureter, urinary bladder and urethra. In: Steven G, Silverberg SG, Dellelis RA, Frable WJ, editors. Principles and practice of surgical cytopathology. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 2191-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Monitironi R, Lopez Beltran A, Mazzucchelli R, Bostwick DG. Classification and grading of the non invasiveurothelial neoplasms: Recent advances and controversies. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Cheng L, Neumann RM, Nehra A, Spotts BE, Weaver AL, Bostwick DG. Cancer heterogenicity and its biologic implications in the grading of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:1663-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Egan MJ, Crocker J. Nucleolar organizer regions in pathology. Br J Cancer 1992;65:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Crocker J, Nar P. Nucleolar organizer regions in lymphomas. J Pathol 1987;151:111-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Morita M, Kuwano H, Tsutsui S, Ohno S, Matsud H, Sugimachi K. Cytomorphometric DNA content and argyrophilic nucleolar organiser regions of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1993;67:480-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Crocker J, Boody DA, Egan MJ. How should we count AgNORS? Proposals for a standardized approach. J Pathol 1989;158:185-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Tomobe M, Shimazui T, Uchida K, Hinotsu S, Akaza H. Argyrophilic organizer regions in proliferating cell has a predictive value for local recurrence in superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 1999;162:63-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Mansour P, Crocker J, Newman J. Lack of prognostic value of nucleolar organizer regions enumeration in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:1261.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1393    
    Printed55    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal